Bushmaster awarded contract for M16

BattleRife

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
115   0   0
For anyone who is interested in the history of the U.S. M16 service rifle, or who simply likes to have a handle on who is making quality equipment, you might be interested to know that Bushmaster has been awarded a firm contract by the U.S. DoD for M16A3 rifles.

Indefinite Contract/ Award Notice is here:
h t t p s://aais.ria.army.mil/aais/award_web_08/W52H0908D01200000/000000.pdf

Purchase order for the first (minimum) quantity is here:
h t t p s://aais.ria.army.mil/aais/award_web_08/W52H0908D01200001/000000.pdf

Taken from the above:
1. Delivery Order 0001 obligates a quantity of 5,631 M16A3 Rifle, NSN 1005-01-357-5112, PN 12012000 in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the basic contract W52H09-08-D-0120. As this order is in excess of the guaranteed minimum quantity of 5,630 each, the
Government is under no further obligation to place any additional orders.
2. The award is processed against Ordering Period 1 (Award through 31 December 2008) and the following CLINS are awarded:
Clin 0008AA - First Article Test for $20.000.00.
Clin 0008AB - 5,631 M16A3 Rifle, 5.56mm, NSN 1005-01-357-5112 at unit price of $715.00 each for a total of
$4,026,165.


The first order is for M16A3 rifles only. The government has the right to exercise options for more M16A3s or for M16A4s. Bushmaster has sold a fair amount of stuff to the U.S. military before, but it was all commercial, off-the-shelf stuff and was not held to all milspec requirements and the guns were not issued to regular U.S. military personnel.

This is newsworthy for several reasons.
-Bushmaster is now the fifth ever contractor for the M16 (Colt, H&R, GM-Hydramatic, FN, Bushamster)
- This is the first new contractor named in almost 20 years (FN got their first contract in 1988).
-This is the first time a company that started making AR-15 clones has been asked to make USGI, milspec rifles
- Bushmaster will be the only M16 contractor other than Colt that is selling rifles and parts to the public.

The first article test report is due Jan. 30, 2009. The first 800 rifles are expected at Crane NSWC Sept. 30, 2009.
 
There is some belief that it could be FMS - although its odd that would be run thru CRANE
Keep in mind the M16A3 is a FIXED carry handle safe-semi-auto gun (basically and auto M16A2) -- since procurement of fixed handle uppers stopped some time ago (over 3 years) it is VERY unlikley its a .mil buy
 
There is some belief that it could be FMS - although its odd that would be run thru CRANE
Keep in mind the M16A3 is a FIXED carry handle safe-semi-auto gun (basically and auto M16A2) -- since procurement of fixed handle uppers stopped some time ago (over 3 years) it is VERY unlikley its a .mil buy

If FMS is Foreign Military Service, could it be for the ANA to complement the 4500 C7's we just gave them?
 
Keep in mind the M16A3 is a FIXED carry handle safe-semi-auto gun (basically and auto M16A2) -- since procurement of fixed handle uppers stopped some time ago (over 3 years) it is VERY unlikley its a .mil buy

They haven't bought any fixed-handle guns in a while, but they are still current and there is no reason to believe this is anything but a new buy of rifles for frontline, GI service.

Bushmaster won only a small portion of the contract, as a kind of starter kit. Once you add up Colt's and FN's portion, this purchase is a minimum of about 19,400 rifles, with options up to well over 100,000.
 
Roger however both the Army, and USMC use optics. The M16A3 was intially for the USN (and 75th RR) - but most of the USN boat guns are now Mk18's - and some M4's -- all flattop.

It just sounds VERY weird -- the ONLY way I can buy it being a true US Mil buy - is they are trying to show Colt is not a Sole Source buy (with the M4) - and pump the M16/M4 after the disaster the Dust test was --- this way three companys will sue and have more to lose - more power with congress etc...
 
I dunno if they'd offer a new contract for rifles to supply the ANA, when I'm sure they must have tens of thousands of M16/M16A1 & probably older M16A2 sitting in warehouses. Sounds more like political wrangling in order to protect Colt by giving the appeareance that they're actually "sharing" the wealth.
 
From a reletively "in the know" guy at M4C
Dano5326
Industry Professional
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 274


DELIVERY SCHEDULE:
FIRST ARTICLE TEST REPORT(FATR)
DUE 407 DAYS AFTER ISSUANCE OF
INITIAL DELIVERY ORDER.
PRODUCTION QUANTITY OF 700 RIFLES
DUE 646 DAYS AFTER ISSUANCE OF
INITIAL DELIVERY ORDER WITH ANY
ADDITIONAL QUANTITIES DUE AT A
RATE OF 700 RIFLES PER MONTH
UNTIL COMPLETION OF DELIVERY ORDER.


Well it looks as if they have, almost two years, time to develop a QA/QC process & get compliant with USG requirements.

It's not quite like calling LMT.. I need 400 m4a1 uppers, 200 extra barrels, 50 m203's, 20 extra 9"PIP barrels & getting them in a couple weeks.
 
From a reletively "in the know" guy at M4C

That is quoted from one of the documents I noted at the top, and corresponds to the dates of Jan. and Sept., 2009.

Interesting that you haven't seen anything but flat tops in USN service recently, it does make you wonder just what they are going to do with them. But, even if they never used for anything but fence posts, I think it is still significant that Bushmaster is being asked to build rifles that meet the full requirements of the TDP and that could be used for regular military service.

Whatever the purpose, I don't think it has anything to do with the results of the sand tests. TACOM announced an intent to procur these guns back in April. The solicitation was opened to all bidders with an announcement of a small-business setaside on May 18, which was a pretty clear sign that they were fishing for at least one new contractor. The setaside was actually further divisible into two portions, so it is possible that a fourth contract will be awarded to an as-yet unnamed company, but that seems unlikely at this point.
 
Back
Top Bottom