Bergara B14R vs RimX, Vudoo, Anschutz, CZ and Tactical Solutions

[grauhanen]

You are just being you and I don't want to get into the weeds with you.

As I stated earlier... If the difference can only be found under ideal clinical conditions, then the difference is moot in practical terms.

If you would like to buy the rifles, scopes and ammo in lots to test it all, then make a video that meets your standards of perfection, by all means go ahead and PLEASE send us all a link.

Keep in mind that people watching these videos have a short attention span and often a limited knowledge. They don't want to watch a 3 hour video that clarifies every miniscule point.

It's understandable that it may be uncomfortable to be made aware of the shortcomings in your methodology. If you don't like getting into the "weeds" don't make unsupportable claims. Insisting the difference is moot doesn't change a thing.

Further, it may not be a good idea to defend your videos that by saying that those who view them are unqualified to draw appropriate conclusions. It's like you're saying they're too unaware (dumb?) to do so. After all, who would agree "Here's a group so it proves what I'm saying" sounds like a good answer?

 

[Maple57]

It's understandable that it may be uncomfortable to be made aware of the shortcomings in your methodology. If you don't like getting into the "weeds" don't make unsupportable claims. Insisting the difference is moot doesn't change a thing.

Further, it may not be a good idea to defend your videos that by saying that those who view them are unqualified to draw appropriate conclusions. It's like you're saying they're too unaware (dumb?) to do so. After all, who would agree "Here's a group so it proves what I'm saying" sounds like a good answer?

Again twist my points, trying to draw me into the weeds.

I'm not calling anyone dumb. I can start a conversation with just about anyone during an f class match and discus jump, jams, BC, burn rates, SD, ES aerodynamic jump, freebore etc and they will probably understand what I'm talking about... You cannot do that in a YouTube video where anyone from anywhere in the world may watch. In such a video you have to qualify every minute detail otherwise the audience will be lost. Doing that draws out the video and makes it exceedingly long and laborious especially for people who understand the subject matter. It's difficult to just dive in expecting the audience to understand.

For the measly hundred bucks a year quite frankly it's in no way worth my time.

If you find value in the video as it is great. If you have thoughts about the content great, at least I got you thinking.

Please send me a link to your video so I can see how we should have done it.

 

[Longstud]

It's understandable that it may be uncomfortable to be made aware of the shortcomings in your methodology. If you don't like getting into the "weeds" don't make unsupportable claims. Insisting the difference is moot doesn't change a thing.

Further, it may not be a good idea to defend your videos that by saying that those who view them are unqualified to draw appropriate conclusions. It's like you're saying they're too unaware (dumb?) to do so. After all, who would agree "Here's a group so it proves what I'm saying" sounds like a good answer?

I dont know where you twist the "LIMITED KNOWLEDGE" into "UNQUALIFIED". But then again your great at bending the truth to your favour. No where did I see any reference made to anyone being DUMB. But now that you mention it a name comes too mind, bet you will never guess. If the shoe fits!! Talk about embarassing oneself,JESUS! Oh by the way love all of your shooting videos. Very informative . Easy to pick at what others do but if you cant do better well??? I guess if it cant be copied or pasted then thats about ending for you KEYBOARD HERO!! STILL HAVE SOME HOLIDAYS CUZ I WORK FOR MYSELF AND CAN AFFORD A SCOPE WITHOUT LOSING TRAVEL ON THE ZERO STOP. Thanks EMERSON my name is CHRIS and I dont assume anything about anybody.