If he's only shooting 30 yards why not just take the scope off & go with the irons?
---------
NAA.
Red dots, notorious for not working in low light
If helping him getting a scope and sighting it in keeps a deer from getting wounded it is more of a moral victory than the pride you will get from not helping him because he’s not a “good hunter”
A modern cheap bushnell beats any old scope…
If you are going to beat them to death with the scope, I would go with a 30mm tube and a 50mm or larger objective... should have more length and weight to increase the arc of your swing and the kinetic energy at impact. I think one good smack with this scope will do less damage than pelting it repeatedly with an Ultralight straight tube 2.5X... JMO.
Low light capabilities of one scope to another are very over rated... that low light hunting situation lasts about 10 minutes... it shouldn't really matter to this guy and this rifle...
Was the title of this thread always "Fudd-friendly?" My eyesight is getting worse... I read it "Fur-friendly scope" when I posted the above... sheesh.
Bushnell banner on a savage 99 the ultimate fudd package
Top that off with see through rings, and its "fudd-master".