Husqvarna 146 9.3x62 Project

Very jealous...you've done a great refresh of one of the quintessential Canadian hunting rifles. Everything is maximized - QD rings, classic looking scope to match at reasonable power, etc. I wish I had this rifle. Only thing I'd change is the location of the forward sling attachment...but your way is more classic. I like the blued extractor and the fact you held off on jeweling the bolt - mad respect.
 
Very jealous...you've done a great refresh of one of the quintessential Canadian hunting rifles. Everything is maximized - QD rings, classic looking scope to match at reasonable power, etc. I wish I had this rifle. Only thing I'd change is the location of the forward sling attachment...but your way is more classic. I like the blued extractor and the fact you held off on jeweling the bolt - mad respect.

Appreciate the kind words!

I was a little hesitant on the barrel band sling swivel since I like slinging up for some shots, but it was a pretty irresistible period feature I felt I just HAD to do. :)
 
Why the switch back to the military safety?

It still has the horizontal safety - I switched back to the military trigger to get the two-stage effect - I prefer that over the attempt by Husqvarna to grind away one of the "humps" - but what they did might likely work very fine. Mostly, I did not understand how it could last. Might have been mostly me.

Maybe too much shooting with half frozen fingers - I prefer to feel the weight of that first stage to know I actually have hold of that trigger - then feel that nice crisp stop for second stage - can hang on that if I want - just break through and the rifle fires - is several Mausers set up like that here - how I want them to work. Also M1917 (aka P17), P14, etc. You can probably imagine the "fun" that I have with the set triggers - no end of times the damn things have gone off at shooting table, without me even being certain that I was on the trigger!!
 
Last edited:
It still has the horizontal safety - I switched back to the military trigger to get the two-stage effect - I prefer that over the attempt by Husqvarna to grind away one of the "humps" - but what they did might likely work very fine. Mostly, I did not understand how it could last. Might have been mostly me.

Maybe too much shooting with half frozen fingers - I prefer to feel the weight of that first stage to know I actually have hold of that trigger - then feel that nice crisp stop for second stage - can hang on that if I want - just break through and the rifle fires - is several Mausers set up like that here - how I want them to work. Also M1917 (aka P17), P14, etc. You can probably imagine the "fun" that I have with the set triggers - no end of times the damn things have gone off at shooting table, without me even being certain that I was on the trigger!!

Right! ..... That makes more sense. Thanks. :)
 
I replaced all my HVA reworked single stage with military 2 stage 98 triggers.
It's just the massive overtravel I can't stand, any 2 stage trigger is better then that 1 inch of pull single stage lol.
 
Well some updates for the good CGN folks who have been kind enough to follow along! Work has been busy, so apologies I don't post nearly as much as I should.

The rifle functions really well. I will note that it does in fact snap the extractor over an already chambered round, which was a concern someone had before. My Mauser Model B does the same, which is a nice feature.

I took the rifle hunting last November and was able to shoot a nice Whitetail Doe with some PPU factory ammo, as I wasn't done my load development. Zeroed it and it grouped fine, so I thought it was good for anything under 200 meters. She stepped out around 30. Shot in the upper chest, cut both lungs and nicked her spine (no tenderloin loss :D ), she did a backflip and died on the spot. Apologies for no picture with the rifle, it was too damn cold that day lol.

FHkvphe.jpg



However, I did go out and go a seating depth test this past weekend as the weather was nice. 12 groups (some not pictured), with a couple promising ones. Those two I'll load up again and confirm results. As an aside, I bought a lead sled, which makes load development from the bench with this gun much more pleasurable. I don't put any weight in the sled, but just the added weight of the sled makes the recoil completely manageable. This rifle is fine in every other situation, but a long string of rounds from the bench isn't the most pleasant.

All loads are the same charge of BL-C(2) with a Hornady 286 Interlock, running out at about 2390 FPS. I have some 250 TSX's which I also want to try, but they are hard to find for me. What would really make me happy is some 250 Accubonds! My previous load development showed this was a strong node for the rifle at this powder charge. Based on my online reading of BL-C(2) charges, I started higher, but it was clearly evident that while it was pushing the 286's out at nearly 2600 FPS, the primers were not happy. The rifle was also just outright not fun to shoot at those higher charges, so this feels like a good place to be.

More to come, as this rifle will be out looking for spring bear this May.

ABM3OHw.jpg

G0KGc6D.jpg

D453GzW.jpg
 
Very beautiful rifle! Classic!

You win big points in the "looks" department, for sure!! Good on you! My own 9.3x62 is a Husqvarna M649, I think - built on a commercial FN Mauser 98 action. I installed a horizontal swing three position safety and went "back" to a standard two stage Mauser military trigger. I initially worked up good loads with 286 grain PPU bullets from TradeEx - then same loading worked fine with 286 Nosler Partitions - but last several years it gets 250 Accubond with Varget powder - I have not chronographed it, but should be 2,650 - ish or so - close enough to factory 250 grain in 338 Win Mag that I have not used the 338 for several years now.

FYI and a head's up - it seems some models of Husqvarna had the same name, but some were M96 receivers and some were M98 receivers - so, for example, an M96 size in 9.3x57 will be too short magazine to accept factory 9.3x62 cartridges. Some like that have been re-chambered - needs the extractor to be beveled to be able to fire as a single shot. The FN action on this one retains the more or less original Mauser extractor - it will not "single feed" - the extractor will not "jump over" the rim of a chambered round - so has to be fed from the magazine only - the way most original military mausers were made.

Your rifle appears built on a former military type action - has the thumb cut-out - might want to verify that cartridge feeding thing ahead of time, in case you find out it won't close, when you REALLY want one more shot!!

Military? Maybe, maybe not. There were quite a few comercial actions that were made with the cut-out.
 
I did not know that - I have never have seen one. I notice the OP's rifle shows the rear scope base nestled in behind the charger ridge - which has not been removed - besides that thumb cut-out, partly why I presumed that to have been originally a military receiver.
 
I did not know that - I have never have seen one. I notice the OP's rifle shows the rear scope base nestled in behind the charger ridge - which has not been removed - besides that thumb cut-out, partly why I presumed that to have been originally a military receiver.

I think the deal is that after the war, tooling was utilized and the cut was part of the original process. Eventually omitted to save cost/time and gave the benefit of a more rigid reciever.
 
I did not know that - I have never have seen one. I notice the OP's rifle shows the rear scope base nestled in behind the charger ridge - which has not been removed - besides that thumb cut-out, partly why I presumed that to have been originally a military receiver.

An astute observation! These actions are commercially made FN actions, which just happen to be in the military pattern. It's the same way that my Mauser Model B also has a cutout and charger guide. I asked Chris to make custom bases for the scope which would allow the charger guide to be preserved, which is a feature that is more correct to the intended period of the rifle.
 
Back
Top Bottom