Sticky for Ruger PCC

In case anyone browsing this sticky isn't aware of the products ATRS is making to improve the ergonomics of the Ruger PC9.... Here's some gunp0rn.

IMG_0267-scaled.jpg


IMG_0257-scaled.jpg


IMG_0221-scaled.jpg

IMG_0281-scaled.jpg


IMG_0205-scaled.jpg


ATRS PC9 Chassis
ATRS PC9 10.5" Barrels
ATRS PC9 7" Barrels
ATRS Short Handguard
ATRS Long Handguard
 
naktabar72 said:
Thanks to bring this rifle to restricted, and stealing the post for trying to sell your stuff.
You are not doing anything to solve the damaged brass issues and occasional Failure to Eject.
Click to expand...

Are you using one of ATRS' barrels and having your FTE issues?
If not why are you slagging on them? They are bringing some great products to market for Ruger users, especially in Canadian market.
They are also a sight supporter so I believe they are within forum rules to 'advertise' their products.
 
naktabar72 said:
Thanks to bring this rifle to restricted, and stealing the post for trying to sell your stuff.
You are not doing anything to solve the damaged brass issues and occasional Failure to Eject.
Click to expand...

You are the reason I come in to work every day. Your positivity simply radiates throughout the community.

GimpyGolden said:
Are you using one of ATRS' barrels and having your FTE issues?
If not why are you slagging on them? They are bringing some great products to market for Ruger users, especially in Canadian market.
They are also a sight supporter so I believe they are within forum rules to 'advertise' their products.
Click to expand...

Thank You. I'll try to edit this post later today with some additional photos of our newest Ruger PC9 product.


Edit: Added new carbon handguards!








 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ZAZ
Does ATRS do custom builds? I like pics 3/4 and would buy that outright, but is this just for components to build myself?
 
naktabar72 said:
Thanks to bring this rifle to restricted, and stealing the post for trying to sell your stuff.
You are not doing anything to solve the damaged brass issues and occasional Failure to Eject.
Click to expand...

This is a really dumb response.
ATRS is simply offering more options for this platform, ones that frankly many of us appreciate. No-one is forcing you to buy anything, so chill out.
Being as they PAY to advertise on CGN and help keep the forum going, unlike you, why wouldn't they bring to everyone's attention what they have created and are offering?
 
Quick question regarding the chassis, which is a fantastic looking piece.

The site mentions its only compatible with Glock magazines and reuses the Ruger Glock mag-well adaptor.

I have managed to modify the Ruger S9 mag-well adaptor to run my Sig P320 magazines. Is there a way I could keep the option of using the S9 mag-well in your new chassis?

Thanks!
 
armybuck041 said:
Quick question regarding the chassis, which is a fantastic looking piece.

The site mentions its only compatible with Glock magazines and reuses the Ruger Glock mag-well adaptor.

I have managed to modify the Ruger S9 mag-well adaptor to run my Sig P320 magazines. Is there a way I could keep the option of using the S9 mag-well in your new chassis?

Thanks!
Click to expand...

I honestly have no answer to that. I simply don't know. If you managed to get the p320 mags to work, it seems to me there's a reasonable possibility you could get your adapter to work in our chassis. It uses the glock magwell adapter in our chassis.
 
my bolt top assembly (the part that's in front of the recoil spring) is rubbing into the top receiver so much that some of the bluing has scratched off

should i be worried or is the part of normal wear and tear
 
Went out again and reshot my original experiment, this time focusing at 50m a more reasonable PCC range and something I feel more confident in personal accuracy.

Previous Post
Reddit thread

I wanted to test how much POI/POA impact shifts at range when you utilize the takedown of the Ruger PC Carbine 9mm. My written experiment was supposed to go like this

The rifle will be tested by first determining the group size, and point of impact on a 12x12 paper target set up 50m away. The rifle will be fired from the sitting position using a bench rest. 5 strings of 10 shots will be fired to establish a baseline of accuracy After the 5 strings, the rifle will be taken down and the barrel separated from the receiver. The barrel will be reattached and another 5 strings of 10 shots fired. This procedure will be repeated 3x for a total of 200 rounds fired.

What I actually tested as I didn't bring enough targets, because when I started the experiment shooting at 100 m I couldn't actually see the red squares on the 4 corners of my target and had to aim at the middle of the target.

1 string of 5 rounds fired at 50 m to verify my personal zero. 1 string of 5 rounds fired at 100 m where I realized I can't see anything and adjusted my test 2 strings of 10 rounds fired at 100 m aiming at the center of each target; after each string of 10 I took the rifle down and waited 1 minute.

So first off my Ruger PC Carbine in 9mm, in the Magpul backpacker stock using the Glock Magwell adapter. This rifle is also the Canadian edition sporting a 18.6" barrel, I used a primary arms MD-25 red dot with 2 MOA red dot.
Click to expand...

Same experiment, different results. TL;DR any shift was imperceptible to bad accuracy or equipment limitation.

za2wpkD.jpg


(1) was 50m zero verification 5 rounds 1-2 inches low.

(2,3,4,5) 4 target and takedown strings. 5 rounds on each red corner target but takedown cycles were conducted on each half top half/bottom half.

A takedown cycle being 10 shots fired (2-5 round strings at 2 red squares), the rifle disassembled, waiting 1 minute reassembling and racking the bolt 3-5 times as per the manual.

An interesting outcome that the experimental data was 1-2 inches off from the control but all of them were similar. A potential possibility that the control string shots wasn't a good string of shots.

but I would personally conclude though that at 50m there is no perceptible difference in accuracy in utilizing the Ruger PC Carbine takedown feature as 1-2 inch shift isn't something to worry about considering 9mm ballistics and the fact that the red dot used is 2 MOA which at 50m is approximately 1 inch target coverage which can explain any difference in point of aim, point of impact.
 
GimpyGolden said:
A new extractor isn't going to fix an ejection issue unless it was slipping off the rim.
Take a look at the ejector and adjust as necessary. I remember mine needed bent slightly downwards to hit lower on the case head and "flung" the casing higher and out of the ejection port.
Click to expand...

which part is the ejector?

so far i've had 1 FTE in 150 rounds of Winchester and 3 FTE in 150 rounds of S&B

not sure if 4/300 is bad

Canuck44 said:
Normal wear.

Take Care
Bob
Click to expand...

thank you
 
There is no reason for you to experience FTE. Find a gunsmith or somebody with experience in firearms sometime the ejector on some gun is just missing the case and the cure is to slightly bend the ejector. This was the case with my S&W Performance Centre Victory .22 it was just set a tad low as I recall and it was missing the brass as the slide moced rearward. Contact Ruger or their warranty centre in Canada they should be able to direct you.

Take Care

Bob
 
GimpyGolden said:
Ejector
View attachment 682506
Click to expand...

Canuck44 said:
There is no reason for you to experience FTE. Find a gunsmith or somebody with experience in firearms sometime the ejector on some gun is just missing the case and the cure is to slightly bend the ejector. This was the case with my S&W Performance Centre Victory .22 it was just set a tad low as I recall and it was missing the brass as the slide moced rearward. Contact Ruger or their warranty centre in Canada they should be able to direct you.

Take Care

Bob
Click to expand...

thank you both

i think my range does have a gunsmith. ill have them take a look next time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom