F-Class open 2023 Scope options.

Superchunk

Member
Rating - 100%
57   0   1
Location
GTA
The struggle is real.....

Currently using a 5-25 .1mil scope, but at 800 yards, a single click is taking me out of the 5's, and messes up my wind holds significantly. So I'm looking to buy my first designated F-class 600-1000 yard scope.

I'm considering the following.

Delta Stryker 5-50 HD 1/8 MOA

Sightron SV 10-50

Nightforce Comp 15-55 with the FCR-1 Reticle.

Budgeting $2300-3000-ish.

Any input from the experienced F-Class open shooters here would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

UPDATE:

Thank you all for the feedback; much appreciated. the one thing I learned here, was that ALL of these scopes are really great, but they are very individual; a lot of reviews don't consider the users physical differences, their other shooting influences like 3-gun or PRS, or the quality of their vision. I for example have excellent distance vision, and can use an incredibly fine reticle, but up close, I cant even see the turret, let alone the magnifications, without 3x glasses or my IDTS reticle magnifier. So these are just the findings of a guy getting into F-class, with a specific budget, a modest experience with high end optics(I own a ZCO & TT, a Razor & and S&B), and enough ability to put lead on V's at 1000 in heavy mirage with a $500 used Strike Eagle, but not enough time on prone to beat serious competitors.

I got a chance to handle a bunch of the suggested scopes. Nightforce, Golden Eagles, Sightrons, a March, even a Kahles 1050. Then I looked at a Delta, after being offered a chance to buy a used one. So, in my humble opinion, here's what I found. ( I've used $250,000 set of Leica Summilx-C lenses at work for comparison, so the bar was set pretty high ).

-The Kahles is hands down the brightest, sharpest and best focusing, IMHO. I didn't like ergonomics of the top Parallax, it just felt unfamiliar, but what a scope.
-The March's were exceptional, but only the MTR-1 reticle worked for me, and I didn't love it at $4300.
-The Nightforce had a weird chromatic edge thing going on, and the eye relief was shallow, not comfortable.Llightest scope in the batch by a mile.
-The Sightrons siii (and another model which I don't remember) were as truly as good as the Kahles in sharpness, though a few stops dimmer, and great warm contrasty color, like the classic S&B look. But the turrets were difficult to see, and I found it rather weighty. From a sheer optical standpoint, incredibly clear, and yes, as advised, the best bang for the buck.
-Golden eagle. Nice turrets. Dark. Really felt like my AMG, but not quite, and the reticles available just didn't quite hit the mark.

Then the Delta. I'll put it lightly. It's sharp as F*&k. Different from the Siii's sharpness, which I think get's its magical status because of edge to edge clarity, and nice warm color. Focuses close enough to do a full Plumb bob alignment in my house. Easy, solid Zero stop. Enough elevation to use it on a 338 for ELR past 3000. D-3 reticle lines up with four sides of the target, so even if you can't see the V, you're on it. Heavy, but the brightness at dusk was sublime, which will make fall evening matches & practices way easier. Did I mention the reticle? loved it. But the one thing I worry about, is the parallax, as the range is only a few degrees of rotation; not really fine until you get to 500 and under, so I'll adopt to putting one of the custom rings on it from IDTS, and correctly calibrate it at the range.
The delta really stood out, and the price, $2275 at Hirsch, you can't complain about. A fellow CGN'er reached out to me and I bought his after trying one, so I'm happy for a great scope at a fantastic price.

If I buy again, it will be the Kahles 1050, no questions asked, other than "when is it on sale?"

Thank you fellas for all the suggestions and messages, it's great to hear from the F-class crowd and see the support they have for the newbies like myself in the pursuit.

Special thanks to John, David, Anwar, Bill, and Kieth for letting me try their scopes, and a special thanks to Allan and Mr Farrel for their concise input and offers on their beautiful scopes. I almost bought the March, but my caveman brain needs hash marks on four sides of a target board or I'm screwed, lol.

Cheers folks.
 
Last edited:
Nightforce then Sightron
have a nightforce I might sell shortly
moving to benchrest again

but for -class those are the bees knees

25 power is not nearly enough

and get better at shooting before you become a clicker

and remember to click past your desired values and then click back to remove any backlash


a micrometer on the scope you own to see if the clicks you are using are in a dead spot or a jump spot for values on,the individual clicks

so much to learn so little time
 
I have competed with Sightron scopes for years in F class and they remain a solid choice. I competed with both the SIII 10-50 LRMOAs and the SV. Very much like the SV side focus.. but it is very heavy. If you have room in the weight dept, it is a fantastic scope.

If weight is an issue, the SIII is a gem. They pick up mirage very well.. some complain about this, I call it a bonus and it helped me gain points in the early morning twitchiness. I am a dealer for Sightron.

As a dealer for Delta, the 5-50 ticks off a number of boxes. Just keep an eye on the warranty. If you are ok with it, can be a great option.

I used to worry about 1/8min for elevation... but with lots of seat time with a 1/4 MOA click, it was far less important then I first thought.

There is plenty of info out there about the NF comps.

If I can help with either the Sightron or delta, please send me a pm or email.

Enjoy F open

Jerry
 
The Nightforce Competition is a great optic, definitely meets needs for F Class. In my opinion, the March 10x60 by 56mm High Master is even better then the Nightforce. And, the new March 8x80 by 56mm High Master (Majesta) is going to even be better. I currently use the 10x60 and wil receive the 8x80 in mid July. But .... price is always an issue.

Just saying .....
 
Last edited:
I have shot and owned scopes for F-Class in price levels from Sightron ($1800) to S & B ($5000). I now run all Sightrons on all my target rifles having tried everything (except Delt which wasn't around) else. Sightrons have proven bulletproof which I can't say about all the rest having broken every make. Right now the only scopes I would consider are Sightron, Delta or Kalhes. Each of these have their quirks but are my top choices after 23 years in F-Class shooting to the national team level.
 
I do not compete in Fclass ( TR GUY HERE) but Ihave worked on , bought and sold a pile of Fclass rifles and scopes over the years.
Once you get to.a certain level of optic IMO it is not so much which is best but which one suits your particular needs
For me, the Sightron S111 scopes are a fantastic piece of equipment .
They are clear, the turrets are precise, and I prefer a small
Target dot as opposed to a hash mark grid style reticle. The price is also on point. Which is a consideration for someone like myself on a fixed income.
I also see no use for stuff like zero stops or illuminated reticles on a square range scope, but I know others who use them.
Cat
 
Last edited:
Probably out of your budget but the Kahles K1050 is very nice. My second choice would be a March 10-60 and the NF competition. Always found the Vortex Golden Eagle picked up way to much mirage and was un-usable on even remotely high power most of the time.
 
Probably out of your budget but the Kahles K1050 is very nice. My second choice would be a March 10-60 and the NF competition. Always found the Vortex Golden Eagle picked up way too much mirage and was un-usable on even remotely high power most of the time.

was shooting with Greg D . One of Canadas better F class open shooters and was on Canadas team has being using one ( VORTEX GOLDEN EAGLE ) for a FEW years and tells me the other Day it’s a GREAT scope !
Funny we all have different opinions based on our own USE ? RJ
 
Last edited:
Shot with greg lots he is definitely one of the best in Canada. And a super nice guy on top of that. Yes some equipment works well for some but not always for everyone. It will be dependent on how much mirage your home range has too. Worst range I have shot on for mirage is Winnipeg.
 
There are five or six guys at my club that use Deltas and they really like them.
Cat

They're easy to get into, and seem to tick more boxes for the transition from other shooting genres, with enough features to make them usable in ELR and the new F-PR classes.

F-Open is a lot of fun, but I'm finding that the gear pays a significantly larger part than in PRS, with the increased accuracy requirements. 5" V's at 1000 vs 12" steel at say 600-800 is an exponential leap in terms of shot placement, without even considering the wind. I have no idea how TR folks accomplish this with a 308 and irons & slings; it's mind blowing. Did you catch Nicole's score at ORA recently??? Staggering; incredible.
 
Shot with greg lots he is definitely one of the best in Canada. And a super nice guy on top of that. Yes some equipment works well for some but not always for everyone. It will be dependent on how much mirage your home range has too. Worst range I have shot on for mirage is Winnipeg.

Good info about the mirage . RJ
 
s.
I have no idea how TR folks accomplish this with a 308 and irons & slings; it's mind blowing. Did you catch Nicole's score at ORA recently??? Staggering; incredible.
Well, for starters don't forget that our scoring rings are twice the size of an Fclass target! LOL!
Seriously though, it is the big reason i enjoy shooting sling'n'irons so much, it puts the focus more on how I am shooting , I tried the Fclass thing - both F/TR and open, I just can't get into it.:p
I saw those ORA Scores, and yes Ms. Rossignal was certainly on fire!
When I mentioned it my older brother, he said " And don't forget that they drove 9 hours+ to get to the match!"
Cat
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom