Anyone have any experience with or stories to share about the Kimber 8400 rifles?
Im interested in trying out the tactical model with McMillan stock in 308 Winchester. When the bore wears down I might try to re-barrel it to 6.5 creedmore.
Are these 8400 actions considered similar to FN SPR series of rifles?
Any pros and cons to consider with the Kimber?
Thanks In Advance!
I have an advanced tactical which is the same except for the tan camo A5 stock having some more options ( cheek riser etc) and the finish being tan for the barrel and action. The rest is the same.
Pros:
- known to be very accurate with 168-175 federal gold.
-Semi custom rifles from Kimber
- very smooth bolt and excellent tactical bolt knob.
Win 70 based action ( yes like the FN)
- bolt win 70 style 3 position safety
-Not many around
-20 moa scope rail with 8-40 screws.
-Mauser-style claw extractor,
-Exvellent crisp trigger ( 3-3.5 lbs great for tactical)
- Action is glass bedded into the McMillan stock
-McMillan stock is of course excellent.
Cons:
-5 round internal magazine with floor plate (no mag system. Like the regular win 70 and REM 700)
-older rifle over 14 years now.
-Not threaded for a muzzle brake/suppressor
- 1:12 twist rate. Could limit some options although works well for most common match ammo.
-Price. These rifles were around 3K for the advanced when new. The tactical was less and the police was the cheapest.
- Not many options to upgrade and due to not being common, I would recommend leaving it stock.
They are great rifles and not very commmon. Price and lack of upgrades were the main weaknesses. You could buy a REM 700 and do it up beyond the Kimber specs and still have money left over toward optics. Or here in Canada at the time it wasn’t too hard to justify going up a level to get everything the Kimber had plus what it lacked in a PGW Coyote. TRG22 was also close enough in price at the time.
Today they are mostly for people like myself who semi collect.