Thanks for the replies. I would be happy with used wood if not too ugly but that may require some shimming in the stock won't it? I guess there will be some fitting either way.
Thanks for the replies. I would be happy with used wood if not too ugly but that may require some shimming in the stock won't it? I guess there will be some fitting either way.
I'm in the early stages of the second option. 2 years ago I bought a repro stock from Marstar (and all the metal bits off EE here). Now I just received yesterday a sporter and a DP rifle from Wolverine as a project for this Winter. The repro wood stock is about the same price as the entire DP rifle with wood and metal, but the DP obviously shows some hard use. So, I guess it depends on how you want the project to look at the end, new or used?
EDIT: I see you are in Alberta, if you happen to be in the SW of AB and find yourself in the SE of BC I could show you the two project rifles I have
I hear you OP.
Funny how the No. 1 MK 3 rifles get no respect, no? A No. 4 is better as far as interest...but the poor No. 1's just get no respect compared to Mauser or M/N offerings of the same era.
I don't know why such preference exists to be honest, but many British soldiers preferred No1 rifle actually. Either way, both are very interesting platforms to play with.
How do these compare with the ones from leeenfieldpartsandmilitaria.com in the UK?
I remember about 30 years ago the crotchety old curator of the Warminster (UK) base weapons museum explained to us that the No1 was a much better rifle than the No4. Don't remember the explanation though.
New reproduction woods is sold by Prestigious woods. They sometimes have some of the metal parts also. Marstar has has a few parts.