My 22 shoots 1/2" groups at 50 yards/meters all day! Really? Prove it!

Some good groups there, looks like my sorta shooter. I get a few 2s to 3s then a bunch of 6 & 7s. I've found SK-FNose doing best and of course it's out of production now. Gotta file off some of the '+' or Magazine :rolleyes: ;)
S-witchy winds :mad: :mad:
 
Biologist said:
Another shoot for the challenge using target aperture sights and ISSF target aiming bulls, clicking up and left-right to spread out the five groups. (I was successful once using apertures, and used same method and gear, see post #2212):


I will get'em next time!

(Targets measured using digital calipers zero'd at -0.220", so the recorded group sizes are center-to-center)

Average 0.491" but DQ’d by two groups:



Average 0.466" but DQ’d by two groups:
Click to expand...

For shooters in general, this challenge is different from the 100 yard challenge thread in which improved results may be posted. In this challenge the objective is the achievement of a certain standard -- five consecutive five-shot groups under .5" each at 50 yards. Allowing for separate entries with optics and with apertures, once it's successfully completed, it's done.
 
An Official Entry July 14th.

Rifle - Anschutz 64 Silhouette, Tasco 8-32x44.
Caldwell Deluxe Rest, and rear bag.
Ammo - Eley Sport
+26 Degrees, very little wind.

I had a bad flier. So I patched, signed and made a new dot.

Jt4uzVT.jpg


zREC2pP.jpg


zI0K2tA.jpg


YwRiGNL.jpg
 
I guess I accidently made it in today! The first 10 shots were just being used to prime the barrel to swapping over to the SK from CCI.

Tika t1x, SK standard+, Match Pro on 16x, $27 Amazon bipod, bag of pea gravel. I didn't even think I WAS doing this challenge, so that really removed the mental aspect of it all.

.48+.47+.43+.4+.36 = 2.14 / 5 = .428" AVG over first 5 groups. .44 for all 6.


 
Jahnj0584 said:
Because of size, or because of not perfectly following the 5 target only rule?
Click to expand...

Great shooting but the target can have only five shot targets to qualify. Think of it like, a person posts a target with eight targets on the sheet and five make the mark but three dont. How is anybody to know which ones are which. Easily able to number after the fact. Youve done it once. Just do it again with only five targets on the page. Youll do it!! Your previous post with the Annie, the second target is obviously larger than the one with the calipers posted. Not trying to be a ######
 
Last edited:
Longstud said:
Great shooting but the target can have only five shot targets to qualify. Think of it like, a person posts a target with eight targets on the sheet and five make the mark but three dont. How is anybody to know which ones are which. Easily able to number after the fact. Youve done it once. Just do it again with only five targets on the page. Youll do it!!
Click to expand...

Well Glenn post# 2235 has 10 targets shot and post 2240 by underthegun who is the OP, who quoted Gleen post. Said he is added to the list. So that contradicts only 5 groups. So you either remove Glenn entry because of a technicality or add Jahn to the list.
 
OkayShooter said:
Well Glenn post# 2235 has 10 targets shot and post 2240 by underthegun who is the OP, who quoted Gleen post. Said he is added to the list. So that contradicts only 5 groups. So you either remove Glenn entry because of a technicality or add Jahn to the list.
Click to expand...

Seriously your going to complain about someone who doesnt have five targets but actually ten that are all under the mark!! Really, Ill call the WAAAAMBULANCE. I recently made an offer to you that Im now gonna retract. Ill just change the offer of sending you free ammo to adding you to my ever growing ignore list. I have always found everyone from the east coast so nice and accomodating. Thanks for fuk^^g up that for me. As too the previous posted targets its quite obvious that the largest target is not the one with the calipres on it in the Annie post. I would accept the second entry but Im not the gate keeper.
 
Longstud said:
Seriously your going to complain about someone who doesnt have five targets but actually ten that are all under the mark!! Really, Ill call the WAAAAMBULANCE. I recently made an offer to you that Im now gonna retract. Ill just change the offer of sending you free ammo to adding you to my ever growing ignore list. I have always found everyone from the east coast so nice and accomodating. Thanks for fuk^^g up that for me. As too the previous posted targets its quite obvious that the largest target is not the one with the calipres on it in the Annie post. I would accept the second entry but Im not the gate keeper.
Click to expand...

Jesus ####, I'm simply just saying that if you allow someone with 10 groups you need to allow someone with 6. If the rule is only 5.

Your the one that lost it blaming an entire province. I wasnt gonna accept your offer anyways, I'm more than capable buying my own ammo.
 
Underthegun said:
There can be more than 5 groups on the page, but they must all be included in the attempt, and must all be UNDER 1/2”
Click to expand...

so .4995 would've been ok, it's the fact that my last group was an even .500 that I'm out? Are we really going to trust verniers for THIS level of accuracy? My mags hold 10 rounds, I'm gonna shoot em until theyre empty.
 
OkayShooter said:
Jesus ####, I'm simply just saying that if you allow someone with 10 groups you need to allow someone with 6. If the rule is only 5.

Your the one that lost it blaming an entire province. I wasnt gonna accept your offer anyways, I'm more than capable buying my own ammo.
Click to expand...

I didnt lose anything. Thankfully the true you appeared and it was an easy decision. If you cant see his target measures are pure BS then a visit to the optometrist is in order which may explain ur difficulty in achieving what your striving for. This be our last encounter. Halileuah
 
Why are there so many "not quite" posts ?? I have lotsa "not quites" that I don't bother posting since the 'challenge' is supposed to be "half-inch groups" .
FAIL PARADE ??
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom