When I bought my sniper for $200 back in the day and so many available should have bought them all!!
Curious. Are the early models with the receiver cuts for a scope (aka "sniper" SVT-40) commanding much of a premium? Asking for a friend![]()
No since they're not sniper models at all and to make one compatible with a correct mount (adding a locking notch) you will bubba it and create a fake sniper worth less.
There are a very small number of genuine Sniper SVT's in in circulation, and a vastly larger number of early production one that have been Bubba'ed to add the 3rd notch.
Wonder if mines a "bubba" ?
Bold statement.
I was just curious whether the earlier models with the receiver cuts for the scope mounts commanded a premium. All the early production (until sometime in '41 or '42, can't remember, Horilka would know off the top of his head) had the side cuts in the receiver so they could be adapted for the scope mount (which involved making a u-notch on the top rear of the receiver to lock the scope mount in place).
There are a very small number of genuine Sniper SVT's in in circulation, and a vastly larger number of early production one that have been Bubba'ed to add the 3rd notch. All things being equal, the receivers with the side cuts only are less common than the slab side receivers, and are more desirable to some. There are after market pic-rail mounts that use the side cuts (no top notch required), and the repro SVT scope mounts can be made to work without the locking notch.
Don't make assumptions about people intentions. It makes you look like an @sshole.
My SVT went down the road, it's a rifle I want to like a lot more than I actually do.
Authentic sniper.
Thats how I feel about them too. Really cool history, looks pretty cool especially with the bayonet, but actually using it left a lot to be desired.
Those were the days when doctrine demanded a rifle 6 ft. long.
Grizz
I thought $220 was to much for one.