I have no issues with cast like that, what do you see is problem with it? Just too much money for not being billet machined stuff? I think that stuff is stiff and tough as fack. It’s not 5 grand so it’s still bridging gap of being a proper hunting rifle you don’t have to treat as a safe queen but it will look and handle hunting like a champ for ages. I see no downside here
For my $$, I don't see any "deal" in a Ruger Hawkeye or whatever they call their semi-98 clonish rifles.
I want something that cost time and money to manufacture, assemble, finish. Casted receivers and bolts are not necessarily off the list, but what I dislike about the Ruger method, is they only finish "visible" surfaces, everything under the stock line is left "as cast" which is a complete cheap out cop out for me... at their retail price for sure, personally, they are 50% overpriced, $600-$700 Hawkeye I'd bite, that is all they are worth to me.
Italians can put out cast hunting rifles with better triggers, better barrels, and better wood for $500 retail here, yeah couple years ago now, but that was the retail price.
Bergara does a Spanish 700 cast clone with better barrels and better triggers for $1100, no real interest to me as I find them overpriced too, but just trying to give you a ballpark where these Ruger fit in.
Cheapest Win M70 is right in the Ruger ballpark, and there is no comparison there in quality, Ruger fails hard.
Just my 2 cent's, but I'm a dude that appreciates quality and workmanship. I'd work over a $300 HVA 98 before I'd even consider spending 5 cents on a Ruger Hawkeye/M77 whatever.