Husqvarna Sporting Rifles #### - ALL MODELS!!!

Well, unless you want to go crazy with the round pressure and exceed the SAAMI and CIP standards, any post 49 M98, 1640 and 1900 will safely do the thing. Actually, only the 1640 and the 1900 were chambered to magnum calibers by HVA and both have similar constructions, the 1900 being a modern action.
Just keep in mind that the M98 transformation into the "commercial" version (i.e. action #200) then into the Supreme (i.e. #300 action) is only based on cutting the manufacturing steps without cutting into quality/ strength, like HVA did for the 1640 is and so on for the 1900.

As for which is the "best" action, it's really hard to say, as per it depends on individual preferences. I liker Mauser actions. But I also like some modern ones, so it's hard for me to answer this question.
 
Last edited:
Agreed Baribal. As you know I worked for RUKO of Canada Ltd, the importer of Husqvarna rifles to Canada, before moving to the Yukon. The amazing strength of the 1640 series was demonstrated to a meeting of writers, distributors, and dealers many years ago.

A new rifle was given to those in attendance to examine. After all had seen it, it was loaded with a factory 30-06 cartridge. The barrel was then filled full of sand and everyone moved to watch from a safe place. The rifle was then fired!

After firing the sand was drained from the barrel, the case removed, and the bore and action completely cleaned by those attending. Headspace was checked and the rifle fired again on a target at 100 yards. I don't remember the group size.

Needless to say everyone was amazed when the headspace was found to be correct, and the rifle fed, fired, extracted, and ejected perfectly.

Ted
 
Last edited:
Between the 640, 1640 and 1900 series rifles I find it quite hard for myself to choose a favourite. They seem to each have their virtues and each are excellent. I’m a sucker for classic so if I had to pick a favourite it would be the 640 series (FN98). The sound and feel of those actions is great
 
Agreed Baribal. As you know I worked for RUKO of Canada Ltd, the importer of Husqvarna rifles to Canada, before moving to the Yukon. The amazing strength of the 1640 series was demonstrated to a meeting of writers, distributors, and dealers many years ago.

A new rifle was given to those in attendance to examine. After all had seen it, it was loaded with a factory 30-06 cartridge. The barrel was then filled full of sand and everyone moved to watch from a safe place. The rifle was then fired!

After firing the sand was drained from the barrel, the case removed, and the bore and action completely cleaned by those attending. Headspace was checked and the rifle fired again on a target at 100 yards. I don't remember the group size.

Needless to say everyone was amazed when the headspace was found to be correct, and the rifle fed, fired, extracted, and ejected perfectly.

Ted

Yes, I am aware of that experience. Actually, it was first done in Sweden and they did a similar thing with the 1900. And there is a also a Swedish consumer test publication of about 10 years ago that tried it with several newer designs that didn't do as good as the 1900...
 
Agreed Baribal. As you know I worked for RUKO of Canada Ltd, the importer of Husqvarna rifles to Canada, before moving to the Yukon. The amazing strength of the 1640 series was demonstrated to a meeting of writers, distributors, and dealers many years ago.

A new rifle was given to those in attendance to examine. After all had seen it, it was loaded with a factory 30-06 cartridge. The barrel was then filled full of sand and everyone moved to watch from a safe place. The rifle was then fired!

After firing the sand was drained from the barrel, the case removed, and the bore and action completely cleaned by those attending. Headspace was checked and the rifle fired again on a target at 100 yards. I don't remember the group size.

Needless to say everyone was amazed when the headspace was found to be correct, and the rifle fed, fired, extracted, and ejected perfectly.

Ted

So where did the pressure go?

Just wondering?
 
So where did the pressure go?

Just wondering?

It uses the same pressure exit point as the M98, the bolt also have a more direct way to redirect the gas flow to the side rail. Not saying the action is invincible, but it's a very sturdy design.
In those "tests", the cases fail in the chamber.
 
What is your experience with the Husqvarna Model 4100 lightweight rifle in 7x57?

I understand that for some reason Husqvarna made their 4100 model with a 1 -12" twist barrel causing some stability issues with some bullet weights and lengths.

I had good results loading 139 grain Hornady Interlocks, but seeing as I had several rifles all shooting 130,139, 140 and 150 grain bullets, I thought I would go heavy and load up some 175 grain bullets I happened to get from a friend, and in my Husqvarna 4100 rifle, they did very poorly, no matter how I altered powder weights.
 
I have had several 4000 and 4100 rifles in 7X57. They all had 1:12 twist of course, and all did very well with 140 gr Nosler Partitions at 2900 fps.

They also did well with 175 gr round nose bullets at around 2450 on targets and were very effective on big game. Actually performed far beyond what one mght expect.

Not bad for a 201/2 inch barrel.

Ted
 
I have had several 4000 and 4100 rifles in 7X57. They all had 1:12 twist of course, and all did very well with 140 gr Nosler Partitions at 2900 fps.

They also did well with 175 gr round nose bullets at around 2450 on targets and were very effective on big game. Actually performed far beyond what one mght expect.

Not bad for a 201/2 inch barrel.

Ted

I remember you sent me some 175 grain bullets Ted, along with load suggestions, and I was hoping they would shoot well, but didn't work for me.
 
Hello all! I'm looking for the alloy bottom metal for a 1600 model husky. Anyone know where I can source one (I'm sure the question of husky parts has been posed a few times!)? Many thanks.
 
Every rifle is a case unto itself, of course. I vaguely remember reading or hearing about one that did okay with 160 gr spitzers, but none of mine ever did.

It is the length of the bullet, not the weight, that determines the twist needed to stabilize it.

Ted
 
Every rifle is a case unto itself, of course. I vaguely remember reading or hearing about one that did okay with 160 gr spitzers, but none of mine ever did.

It is the length of the bullet, not the weight, that determines the twist needed to stabilize it.

Ted

Ted, there were a few writings in the days (late '50s) claiming that they had problems with the heavier 7mm, especially those having a boat tail design.
 
Hi Folks, my HV 1640 in 30-06 from Intersurplus is OTW. Very happy about that.

Quick question though, are there any pdf manuals or writeups on the care and maintenance of these rifles? It would be great to have a reference, like for my newer rifles.

EDIT: I read on some forums that the Mauser 98 manual would apply to the Husky 16XX rifles, so I pulled that pdf off the interwebs. Is that true?
 
Hi Folks, my HV 1640 in 30-06 from Intersurplus is OTW. Very happy about that.

Quick question though, are there any pdf manuals or writeups on the care and maintenance of these rifles? It would be great to have a reference, like for my newer rifles.

EDIT: I read on some forums that the Mauser 98 manual would apply to the Husky 16XX rifles, so I pulled that pdf off the interwebs. Is that true?

Well, yes and no.
The 1640 is not directly a M98, but it's close. Then, as caring the rifle is involved, it's pretty basic and is quite the same as a M98.
Husqvarna's maunal is pretty minimal, not much in there, but here it is.

https://i.postimg.cc/tJJSkZQM/1960-HVA-warranty-02a.jpg

1960-HVA-warranty-02a.jpg

A pretty good description of the rifles can be found in "Bolt Action Rifles" by Frank de Haas, page 246.

Enjoy !
 
Don’t have it yet, but I bought a Husqvarna light weight carbine 30-06…
I’ll know more when I it is here!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0622.jpeg
    IMG_0622.jpeg
    148 KB · Views: 26
  • IMG_0623.jpeg
    IMG_0623.jpeg
    148.1 KB · Views: 26
Husqvarna 649?

I own a few large caliber rifles, but I always wanted 9.3 x 62 Husqvarna.

INTERSURPLUS to the rescue!

I know it is not a 98 receiver, but that does not bother me in the least and it is not drilled and tapped, just what I'm looking for.

Stock seems solid without any cracks.

Should I bed the action completely?

Date of manufacture seems confusing as the online list refers to possibly 1944, 1945 or 1946?

Serial # 90009

Does anyone know what bullet weight these sights are usually for?

Any and all information greatly appreciated.

DSCF9355.jpegDSCF9361.jpegDSCF9358.jpegDSCF9359.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Here are a few photos of the new to me Husqvarna in 30-06, 20.5” barrel, none factory adjustable comb. That rifle looks to be in close to new conditions!
The stock is already bedded, came with a nice leather and “canvas” sling and weaver scope base! Non factory recoil pad in new soft conditions and properly installed! Both front and rear sights are on and not adjustable other than windage! Anymore info would be appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0678.jpeg
    IMG_0678.jpeg
    73.5 KB · Views: 14
  • IMG_0679.jpeg
    IMG_0679.jpeg
    79.3 KB · Views: 14
  • IMG_0680.jpeg
    IMG_0680.jpeg
    79.3 KB · Views: 12
  • IMG_0681.jpeg
    IMG_0681.jpeg
    88.7 KB · Views: 12
  • IMG_0682.jpeg
    IMG_0682.jpeg
    70.1 KB · Views: 12
  • IMG_0683.jpeg
    IMG_0683.jpeg
    50.7 KB · Views: 14
Back
Top Bottom