It also says to call or email for shipping quotes"This item cannot be purchased online" is what the Lever website has to say.
Shooting Norc ammo of doubtful availability hardly seems like a reason to get a 308 for hunting.
There'd be some mental gymnastics from the 308 Fans that somehow less is more if you can get Norc ammo.Maybe we should add the .270 into the debate?
thats unfair to bothMaybe we should add the .270 into the debate?
I’ll call and raise ya to .280Maybe we should add the .270 into the debate?
Especially when the much more powerful 30-06 makes sooo much difference in the field hahahaThere'd be some mental gymnastics from the 308 Fans that somehow less is more if you can get Norc ammo.
That's a new one to me..."recoil=accuracy"...recoil equals accuracy.
Either caliber will drop anything you shoot at.
The size of your #### decides.
Recoil has zero effect on accuracy if you aren't afraid of it. I have plenty of heavy recoiling rifles that I would shoot against a .223... including a .458 Lott, as it is one of my most accurate rifles with 500 grain DGX.On a bench tho, right? Perhaps what was meant was recoil is adversely proportional to accuracy relative to the shooter.
Would you shoot it from offhand, kneeling etc against someone with, say, a Tikka in 223 for money? Or, with just you as the variable, would you bet that you wouldn't shoot one of your much lighter recoiling rifles better?
If that's true, you're very much an outlier.Recoil has zero effect on accuracy if you aren't afraid of it. I have plenty of heavy recoiling rifles that I would shoot against a .223... including a .458 Lott, as it is one of my most accurate rifles with 500 grain DGX.
Only in that I am not afraid of recoil... but I shoot with lots of guys that aren't afraid of recoil. However, I am also on CGN where many times there are recommendations for a .243 over a .308 for the reduced recoil... so if folks are concerned about the recoil of a .308, then they are concerned with recoil, period. If your head is in a bad place and you short circuit and flinch before every squeeze, it will certainly affect your accuracy. Once you ingrain that the thump won't kill you, there is no reason to not shoot the heavier recoiling cartridges accurately.If that's true, you're very much an outlier.
Philosophically, that is true. But I doubt anyone can actually practice it.Only in that I am not afraid of recoil... but I shoot with lots of guys that aren't afraid of recoil. However, I am also on CGN where many times there are recommendations for a .243 over a .308 for the reduced recoil... so if folks are concerned about the recoil of a .308, then they are concerned with recoil, period. If your head is in a bad place and you short circuit and flinch before every squeeze, it will certainly affect your accuracy. Once you ingrain that the thump won't kill you, there is no reason to not shoot the heavier recoiling cartridges accurately.
The folks in your shooting/hunting circle need to get away from their keyboard, out of their cubicle, eat a pot roast, and shoot a couple hundred rounds with .40 cal plus rifles... after that, their shooting will improve immensely with the "little" .300 magnums, let alone the .308 or .30/06... they will wonder what the fuss was all about. It is simply a matter of experience and training.Philosophically, that is true. But I doubt anyone can actually practice it.
Likely he believes he shoots his big boomers as well as the 223s but has never actually verified this, he may be right I just doubt it. People maintain that what they believe is true, even when it is more faith based than it is evidence based.Haha, I think I see where you are coming from;
It's 2024, where feelings matter and results are optional!
On the other hand, if you don't consider common sense a super power, then it's just mind over matter. Physiologically, the BANG is a lot scarier than the recoil.
Postional shooting gets interesting though. Big boomers demand perfect shooting form to keep point of impact consistent.
Likely Greg shoots so much and so frequently he takes this for granted as second nature![]()
The folks in your shooting/hunting circle need to get away from their keyboard, out of their cubicle, eat a pot roast, and shoot a couple hundred rounds with .40 cal plus rifles... after that, their shooting will improve immensely with the "little" .300 magnums, let alone the .308 or .30/06... they will wonder what the fuss was all about. It is simply a matter of experience and training.
Likely he believes he shoots his big boomers as well as the 223s but has never actually verified this, he may be right I just doubt it. People maintain that what they believe is true, even when it is more faith based than it is evidence based.
Look at it this way. Maybe you can shoot your 458 magnum better than 90% of people shoot a 223. Thats fantastic. But I still think you're going to outshoot yourself with a 223 compared to with your 458.
Unless someone says "Yep, I tried, and here's the results" well...
And the "man up/keyboard warrior" implications have started haha. Could it be we hit the root of the insistence here?Maybe shooting the lil guns a wee bit better may be a bitter pill haha
Maybe, if they practice perfectly with the boomers they improve across the board.
Maybe they don't practice perfectly and end up with a bunch of bad habits
But I don't think after a couple hundred rounds of .40 cal rifles they shoot them better than a 223. I don't think that anyone does.
Willing to concede that we haven't tried it, and as of now its unverified speculation vs unverified speculation.