What is your proof?
Magpul PDR-C.
- Thread starter Deckard
- Start date
What is your proof?
Prove to me that Zastava operating as Yugo made worse cars than Toyota. Prove to me that a Toyota FJ is a better out-of-the-box off road vehicle than a Hyundai Santa Fe. You know what? Prove to me that 2+2=4.
You want proof that the SU-16 has a longer barrel for a lighter, more compact carried package? Well, that would be "eyeballs". My proof is eyeballs.
You want proof that Kel-Tec is badly executed? Well, I used eyeballs again, but I also used hands. Eyeballs and hands are my proof.
My impression from having handled everything KelTec makes is that the quality of the execution is a betrayal of the genius of the concept. And boy howdy, is there genius in those concepts. Execution wise, did I imagine the heavy flash left around all the plastic parts? Did I imagine the grinding feeling as the bolt handle is pulled? Perhaps I should have filmed me putting a trigger scale on that bullpup 308, and not simply dry fired it and said "wow! crap trigger!".
If a company makes 100% quality, it makes product that may, depending on the performance features of the product vs. the quality of the product, be worth buying. If a company makes 75% quality, and 25% annoying, frustrating sh!t that isn't reliable and has to go to the gunsmith every 4 weeks (Read about the SU-16 on Arfcom. Enough anecdotal evidence *becomes* statistics.) it makes nothing but sh!t, and should be avoided. This is why I shoot a Glock, not a CZ.
Firearm design and manufacturing must stand on the twin pillars of reliability and consistency. It doesn't matter what a gun can do, if every gun of that model can't do it every single time without fail, and all do it the same way. Again, this is why I shoot a Glock, not a CZ.
I mean, seriously.
