They (alaskans) also get to carry handguns.
A little history.
In the eighties a neighbour was a US customs officer at CYYC.
He had been a sheriff in Alaska, where concealed carry law mirrored Canada’s.
The sheriffs had agreed that they would not issue permits to anyone who didn’t have sufficient economic or political clout to override their decision.
It took quite some time, and a great deal of work by firearms owners, to convince the legislature to remove that authority from them.
But, they did, following Florida’s lead in instituting “shall issue” permits that removed the discretion that had allowed their high handed mass refusals.
When 9/11 came along, the legislature was convinced to remove the requirement to seek permission to go armed.
They became one of the first states to adopt constitutional carry, because they were told that it was an outrage to treat the people as slaves while criminals did whatever they damned well pleased.
We could have been the beneficiaries of a comparable change in Canada, if we didn’t have so many among us who can’t wrap their minds around one simple fact.
Long before the American Revolution, British subjects had a well recognized right to carry arms.
The same right that some Americans demanded constitutional protection for, before they would ratify.
Constitutional protection that has, at times, been absolutely useless.
That happens whenever the people fail to stand up for the right of their neighbours to keep and bear arms, a failure that has been all too common throughout the world.