I have some 444 brass I bought some years back to fiddle with. I have two LE No.1 Mk III .410 single shot. One is the original “blown out” .303 cartridge type and the other will take .410 ammo. I have used a few .444 brass in the .410 ammo one.
Never mind, you can have it anyway!!Never understood the NEED for such a dumb answer !![]()
RJ
With the exception of the 222 and 300WinMag there really wasn't any need for any new sporting cartridges after the 270Win was introduced.Never understood the need for a 444!
Bigger is not always better... You get worse sectional density for the same weight bullet, typically a worse ballistic coefficient for the same weight bullet too... And to match the SDs and BCs you get from the smaller caliber without sacrificing velocity you're looking at more recoil.The .444 came about in 1963 when the 45-70 had faded into obscurity. With the resurgence of the .45-70, the only real reason to pick up a .444 is the better factory loads for it. If you handload, the .45-70 is bigger (.458 vs .429) which is better. I have both, but don't use the .45-70 much.
No one buys a 45-70 for its BC, and SD doesn't matter - a 400+ grain hard cast will penetrate 2x more than you will need.Bigger is not always better... You get worse sectional density for the same weight bullet, typically a worse ballistic coefficient for the same weight bullet too... And to match the SDs and BCs you get from the smaller caliber without sacrificing velocity you're looking at more recoil.
I have a soft spot for the 444. No real idea why, I haven't even owned one... Just something about it tickles my fancy. I would LOVE a lever action in 444 but they're typically pretty expensive, so I'll most likely end up with a CVA Scout when I get around to buying one.
As Ken Waters Said "You can eat right up to the hole"....Never understood the need for a 444!
This^^^ The 45-70 was an old, dead black powder relic. Changing hunting laws in the US allowing for special black powder seasons, and states allowing modern made, antique designs generated a renewed interest and bingo, it was back. I almost bought a .444 in the 70's, but bought a 7 x 57 instead. No regrets, but the .444 is a good cartridge that warrants a second look. For medium bore, I went to a cartridge almost as olc as the 45-70, 9.3 x 62. More cost effective IMO, and more performance.The .444 came about in 1963 when the 45-70 had faded into obscurity. With the resurgence of the .45-70, the only real reason to pick up a .444 is the better factory loads for it. If you handload, the .45-70 is bigger (.458 vs .429) which is better. I have both, but don't use the .45-70 much.
It's basically a straight walled 30/06 case with a rim.Never understood the need for a 444!