Successfully making a 500 yard shot makes you a good shot not a good hunter.
A person that stalks an tracks an animal for 2 hours and takes it with a 50 yard shot in thick brush is a better hunter than someone who just sits at a field edge shooting Coyotes at 400 yards.
One is a hunter, one is a target shooter.
I disagree, because the person who is hunting ( in your example, coyotes) still has to locate them and be able to camouflage himself to be able to make that shot . Pressured coyotes and wolves are suspicious of everything even at 400 yards or better. It's what varmint hu tong is all about.
In the case of a deer at say, 500 yards, the hunter still has to locate the deer , a d get into position to make that shot . That means he may have stalked for quite a while to get into that position Nd can get no closer .
For example. If a moose hunter is calling and the bull hangs up at 200 yards , he is still hunting if he kills the bull at that range.
Putting an arbitrary distance on whether or not a person is hunting is ridiculous because there are a pile of traditional bow hunters out there that refuse to shoot past 25 yards . Doesn't mean the trad hunter who can make the shot at 40 yards is not a hunter. Same as rifle hunting .
I personally have made kills at less than 12 yards with a rifle. Does that mean any animal I killed when I was out for less than an hour and shot at over 100 yards, that I was not hunting ?
Shooting is part of hunting if you are shooting at an animal.
Otherwise no, the two are not in the same category, but a person has to own their shot after it is out of the rifle, be it a clean kill or a wounding shot regardless of the distance.
Cat