Thunderhog
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- East Kootneys
Choot-Em Lisa, Choot-Em!......What about drones flying over duck blinds trying to interfere with a legal hunt?
Choot-Em Lisa, Choot-Em!......What about drones flying over duck blinds trying to interfere with a legal hunt?
Man... talk about going full retard.You sound like a left-wing Liberal supporter and lover. After 20 plus years in law enforcement, I have never seen someone as obsessed about protecting drones as you. What gives?...![]()
Bull-$hit!Man... talk about going full retard.
In no way was the member (i.e.: IDCAY) defending the illegal use of drones, or arguing against the legal rights of a property owner. All the member said is that - generally speaking - shooting at a drone might come with some serious legal consequences and that one should assume that a drone's operator might have high-quality evidence of the shooting. One would hope that the average person could read the room and see - clearly - the intention was to protect every CGN member and the CGN community from possible jeopardy, not - as you suggest - to protect drones or any particular drone.
Don’t you know the government disguises drones as birds. Those aren’t ducks you’re shooting atWhat about drones flying over duck blinds trying to interfere with a legal hunt?
Here's a link to some polarized sunglasses!Bull-$hit!
Another drone defender and liberal retard.
Lots of this here on Gunnutz now…..![]()
I can only imagine how fun it would be to spend a day in a blind or boat with you.Long barrel, removable chokes and I'd suggest slightly heavier shot. I have brought down many pigeons using #4 shot. Pigeons would shrug off multiple hits of #7 and #8 shot. Slightly heavier will also carry energy further distance and you want to bring down a drone as far away as possible
Are you admitting to having shot down a drone? Cause that is SERIOUSLY illegal in Canada. It is the legal equivalent of shooting down an airplane.
You can't legally shoot down drones under any circumstances.
You should NOT do this. Or at least you should not discuss it on the internets. It is highly illegal.
Rough week?Are you retarded or just plain stupid?
If a drone comes on to my acreage and starts snooping around, it will disappear, it's very simple.
One could where a mask or hoodie and no one would ever be able to identify the person.
Reading this thread and listening to you defend drones like they are your God is pathetic to say the least.
Maybe take up a different hobby and try to become a guest on the View! Lot's of WOKE left supporting b!tches for you to talk about drones with.
You sound like a left-wing Liberal supporter and lover.
After 20 plus years in law enforcement, I have never seen someone as obsessed about protecting drones as you.
What gives?.......![]()
Not at all!....Rough week?
View attachment 886565
Good question....when would it be legal to shoot one down in Canada, realistically.So who has shot a drone? Legally of course.
People like to phuc around until they find out.I work in the drone industry and have been in for the past years since 2019. One main thing I learned is that even though it's considered a toy and fun tool for most. It's considered an aircraft by Police, Government and especially Transport Canada. I've worked with alot of the bigger Police Services units as ASU's across GTA and SW Ontario and they're pretty serious about the use of them for their operations.
Doesn't matter that it's less than 250g(mRPA) and doesn't need a pilot certificate. The law is clear that you can't shoot it down just because its over your property. Which by the way is owned and managed by Transport Canada / NAV Canada and require clearance in some cases (Advanced Pilot Cert) to get approval.
But hey, dont' take my word for it. Shoot one down and see what happens, maybe you'll be fine.
Cheers,
Please don't feed the Troll. It's a habit of his. Thank goodness most of his colleagues don't share his mindset.Man... talk about going full retard.
In no way was the member (i.e.: IDCAY) defending the illegal use of drones, or arguing against the legal rights of a property owner. All the member said is that - generally speaking - shooting at a drone might come with some serious legal consequences and that one should assume that a drone's operator might have high-quality evidence of the shooting. One would hope that the average person could read the room and see - clearly - the intention was to protect every CGN member and the CGN community from possible jeopardy, not - as you suggest - to protect drones or any particular drone.
it's interesting you say that.What are the charges for using a drone illegally? IE some peeping Tom etc.