Anyone currently hunting with 357 magnum?

Joel

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
GunNutz
Rating - 99.8%
453   1   0
And if so, how are you liking it?

350 Legend and other larger cartridges are no doubt better, let alone 44 magnum, but thinking of it from a "cheap shooting" POV if handloading, kinda hard to beat. One of the single shots on the market would be fun.
 
I had a Marlin 1894 in 357 RM for a number of years , a great little walking around rifle . I shot a lot of Coyotes and a number of Porcupines with it, it worked quite well . It was illegal to use on deer here at that time , so I have no experience with it in that regard . I'm sure it will take deer within certain range limitations , I've watched a buddy of mine in Montana cleanly take Mule Deer with a six inch barreled revolver chambered in 357RM a number of times . That being said , and I'll get grief for saying this, I always felt it was too big for the small stuff , and too small for the big stuff , but that's just me. It's pretty much perfect for what you have in mind though .
 
And if so, how are you liking it?

350 Legend and other larger cartridges are no doubt better, let alone 44 magnum, but thinking of it from a "cheap shooting" POV if handloading, kinda hard to beat. One of the single shots on the market would be fun.
I was just thinking and re read your post about a single shot......one of the things i love about my 357 marlin is the quick ability for follow up shots
 
While I dont hunt with a 357m id have no issues shooting deer at preferred angles at short range. However id want to hunt in more open woods where I could watch the deer run
 
I like my .357 mag carbine. It's great for killing tin cans and ringing gongs. Shot a couple beavers and porcupines with it. But that's about all it's good for, since shooting anything bigger that you need a tag to hunt is illegal in SK, and for shooting small stuff like gophers, a .22 is enough. But it certainly is fun to shoot!
 
Last edited:
Where I used to hunt the bush was thick and the shots were 40y and under.
I had a JM Marlin and later a Ruger 77-357. Both did well and so did my bows.
That was only 5 years ago.
 
I like my .357 mag carbine. It's great for killing tin cans and ringing gongs. Shot a couple beavers and porcupines with it. But that's about all it's good for, since shooting anything bigger that you need a tag to hunt is illegal in SK, and for shooting small stuff like gophers, a .22 is enough. But it certainly is fun to shoot!
Don't tell that to Game Warden Louis Kis...... :)

https://whitefishpilot.com/news/2017/nov/21/former-game-warden-recalls-decades-old-griz-9/
 
Naysayers about the capabilities of the 357 magnum, within reasonable ranges, are all over the place. Most have little to no experience with the cartridge out of good strong firearms, with longer barrels.

You can't compare a 4-8 inch barreled handgun to an 18-24 inch barreled rifle.

When it was still legal to use them, one of my favorite rifles out of a tree stand was the 30 M1 Carbine, along with the 30 M1 Carbine cartridge. It was lethal on Deer size game out to 75 yards, which was about the maximum distance I could see from my tree stand.

The 357 magnum, with 158 grain bullets, out of a 24 inch barreled Martini, single-shot rifle puts the bullet through both sides of a Deer at 75 yds.

I wouln't hesitate to use my Chiappa mod 92, chambered for 357 magnum out to 75 yds.

The thing is, the cartridge is limited, and so your shots should be within those limitations.
 
To be clear, I agree that the .357 CAN be used to efficiently kill medium sized big game like deer and black bear with proper bullets and at ranges under 100 M. It's just illegal to do so where I hunt in Saskatchewan. In my stash I have a bunch of handloads - Hornady 180 gr. XTP bullets loaded to a velocity of 1750 fps using Lil'Gun powder out of my Winchester M92 carbine's 20" barrel. I carry that rifle and load when going for a casual walk at our remote BC bush camp. I have encountered several black bears while doing so, and never felt inadequately armed. But I never had to shoot any of those bears either.
I like the post above by bear hunter ... "the cartridge is limited, and so your shots should be within those limitations" YUP!
 
You can't compare a 4-8 inch barreled handgun to an 18-24 inch barreled rifle.

But even if you wanted to, it's not like there isn't handgun hunters using 357mag to kill deer stateside. Even from 6-8" handguns with cylinder gaps stealing some energy, 357mag still has what it takes to get the job done.

I don't hunt with a 357mag, but that is because of the places I hunt rather than the capability of the cartridge.
 
Suther, they may be hunting with handguns, but hopefully in an ethical manner.

When I was younger, I watched a fellow in Arizona shoot a small Mule Deer buck with a 357 magnum, loaded with factory 158 grain, half jacket, flat nose bullets.

The pistol was a lovely custom S&W, with an 8 inch, heavy barrel, cut with a dovetail to mount the LER 3X scope.

I watched this hunt very closely, as did the rancher, who owned the property. It was the first time he had allowed a handgun hunt on his property, and the only reason he did was because a well known author, writing for a prestigious magazine, begged and pleaded and maybe offered one of his "virgin" daughters for the privilege.

The hunt was going to be the basis for a magazine article, and the shooter was accompanied by a cameraman, who was constantly in the way.

The first shot was at just over 100yds, and the bullet went under the Deer's belly, too far back for a clean kill. Good thing he missed.

That Deer had a death wish, he stood there, broadside, until the shooter took a second shot. There was a "thump" sound as the bullet hit the rib cage, but low, just above the breast bone.

The Deer took off running as hard as it could, obviously terrified, but didn't leave a blood trail.

The shooter wanted to chalk it up to a "miss." The rancher had a different opinion.

We saw another buck about a half hour later, in the adjacent ravine, laying down, and soaking up sunlight.

The pistolero wanted to shoot it, but the rancher told him it wasn't going to happen until he got within 50 yards.

After a very slow, careful creep, the cameraman told him they were close enough, and the angle was good for a picture.

We were watching from the top of the ravine, a few hundred meters back.

The buck got their scent on the wind, stood up, stretched, and started to walk away. The pistolero took the shot and hit him just behind the shoulder, about 8 inches from the bottom. It was a good shot, and even though the Deer ran off, it fell down about 30 yards later, got up again, and wobbled for a few more yards before finally going down and staying down.

We sat and watched, as did the shooter and cameraman, for about ten minutes before getting closer. The Deer was dead.

The surprise was that it was the "same" Deer he had shot an hour and a half earlier.

The first bullet had hit the Deer, penetrated about two inches, and stopped on the rib, just at the base of the breast bone. The animal would have likely survived, with lots of pain involved, if it hadn't waited around.

Not all of the stories you read in those magazines tell the whole truth. In this particular case, the author/pistolero was ethical enough not to write the story.

The rancher allowed pistol hunting on his property afterwards, but only if the shooters could pass his skill tests, and if they were accompanied by a guide, who kept the shots within ethical ranges.

There's a very good reason you don't see a lot of articles written about handgun hunting for big game, other than hogs at close range.
 
But even if you wanted to, it's not like there isn't handgun hunters using 357mag to kill deer stateside. Even from 6-8" handguns with cylinder gaps stealing some energy, 357mag still has what it takes to get the job done.

I don't hunt with a 357mag, but that is because of the places I hunt rather than the capability of the cartridge.
As I mentioned in my previous post , I've watched as a friend of mine in Montana took a couple of Mulie does with his 357 chambered revolver. They were both within about 50ish yards, but they went down quickly .
 
Suther, they may be hunting with handguns, but hopefully in an ethical manner.

When I was younger, I watched a fellow in Arizona shoot a small Mule Deer buck with a 357 magnum, loaded with factory 158 grain, half jacket, flat nose bullets.

The pistol was a lovely custom S&W, with an 8 inch, heavy barrel, cut with a dovetail to mount the LER 3X scope.

I watched this hunt very closely, as did the rancher, who owned the property. It was the first time he had allowed a handgun hunt on his property, and the only reason he did was because a well known author, writing for a prestigious magazine, begged and pleaded and maybe offered one of his "virgin" daughters for the privilege.

The hunt was going to be the basis for a magazine article, and the shooter was accompanied by a cameraman, who was constantly in the way.

The first shot was at just over 100yds, and the bullet went under the Deer's belly, too far back for a clean kill. Good thing he missed.

That Deer had a death wish, he stood there, broadside, until the shooter took a second shot. There was a "thump" sound as the bullet hit the rib cage, but low, just above the breast bone.

The Deer took off running as hard as it could, obviously terrified, but didn't leave a blood trail.

The shooter wanted to chalk it up to a "miss." The rancher had a different opinion.

We saw another buck about a half hour later, in the adjacent ravine, laying down, and soaking up sunlight.

The pistolero wanted to shoot it, but the rancher told him it wasn't going to happen until he got within 50 yards.

After a very slow, careful creep, the cameraman told him they were close enough, and the angle was good for a picture.

We were watching from the top of the ravine, a few hundred meters back.

The buck got their scent on the wind, stood up, stretched, and started to walk away. The pistolero took the shot and hit him just behind the shoulder, about 8 inches from the bottom. It was a good shot, and even though the Deer ran off, it fell down about 30 yards later, got up again, and wobbled for a few more yards before finally going down and staying down.

We sat and watched, as did the shooter and cameraman, for about ten minutes before getting closer. The Deer was dead.

The surprise was that it was the "same" Deer he had shot an hour and a half earlier.

The first bullet had hit the Deer, penetrated about two inches, and stopped on the rib, just at the base of the breast bone. The animal would have likely survived, with lots of pain involved, if it hadn't waited around.

Not all of the stories you read in those magazines tell the whole truth. In this particular case, the author/pistolero was ethical enough not to write the story.

The rancher allowed pistol hunting on his property afterwards, but only if the shooters could pass his skill tests, and if they were accompanied by a guide, who kept the shots within ethical ranges.

There's a very good reason you don't see a lot of articles written about handgun hunting for big game, other than hogs at close range.
The deer I mentioned shooting earlier was shot with a 357 mag revolver. It died. Like shooting game with any firearm, you have to understand the limitations you're working within. - dan
 
Just playing around on my buddies farm I brought my 44mag cva scout v2 and he had his rossi 357 lever gun with about 18" barrel. Shooting water jugs his carbine with 158gr American eagle was out penetrating my 44mag 240gr xtps. The 44 visually hit harder and did more damage to the water filled jugs but that Lil 357 offered up straight penetration and went thru 5 or 6 jugs and smacked the back stop
 
Just playing around on my buddies farm I brought my 44mag cva scout v2 and he had his rossi 357 lever gun with about 18" barrel. Shooting water jugs his carbine with 158gr American eagle was out penetrating my 44mag 240gr xtps. The 44 visually hit harder and did more damage to the water filled jugs but that Lil 357 offered up straight penetration and went thru 5 or 6 jugs and smacked the back stop
Back in the day we loaded up some anti bear 357 loads with 180 gr flat point bullets (silhouette bullets). Drove them as fast as we dared, and tested them on bear skulls. They would punch right through. Recoil was fierce in a 4 inch handgun, and I don't think a steady diet of them would be a good choice for anything this side of a Redhawk, but they did the job. - dan
 
Back
Top Bottom