Unfortunately the only way of finding out is shooting it. Even the high end stuff can be disappointing. Not a warm fuzzy feeling spending $350 for a brick of Exact and the $130 SK LRM outshoots it. But as mentioned many times That’s Rimfire
This!.....I shot alot of CCI Blazer, in my opinion the bulk ammo is not near the quality of the ammo in the 50 round boxes.
I have experienced the same issues.
Not alwasy true. Put it in a pretty box, sell it for a pretty price, it will shoot better for some based only on Placebo effect. LOL.Simple answer. Yes absolutely... always... if cheap ammo could perform like expensive ammo there wouldn't be expensive ammo. Regardless of your particular rifle and it's own preference for what what it can shoot there is a fundamental and physical difference between each brand and type of ammo. That's why manufactures have different types in the same category... at different price points.. this isn't difficult to understand right? Let alone the BC difference between bullet weight and FPS average. If your buying ammo that pours out of a milk carton expecting it to perform like something that has packaging that keeps the cartridge individually placed in a container separated from it's sibling.. they are not close to being comparable. Though they are all capable of providing an amount of satisfaction, some will satisfy a little or a lot more. Cheers
No. It's not that simple. Rifles don't prefer one brand or type of ammo. The ammo that every rifle shoots well is ammo that's consistent as possible from one round to the next. All match ammo manufacturers make such ammo. The problem is that not all batches of the match ammo they make are equal.Simple answer. Yes absolutely... always... if cheap ammo could perform like expensive ammo there wouldn't be expensive ammo. Regardless of your particular rifle and it's own preference for what what it can shoot there is a fundamental and physical difference between each brand and type of ammo. That's why manufactures have different types in the same category... at different price points.. this isn't difficult to understand right?
It is not infrequent that we hear a slightly milder, or slightly shaper detonation; that being said, it is rare that a milder or harsher than average shot turns out to be the flier. More often than not, it is one that sounds normal. Likewise, with velocity; when I watch different ammo testing, it is not often it is the fast or the slow outliers that that fly, it is usually one in the median group.*Generally speaking* I find better accuracy with standard velocity ammunition.
Or perhaps it's because you generally don't find SV in bulk boxes.
But I don't think that I've ever had anything go to extremes like that. Not even the crappy Remington Goldens, where I could hear the extreme shot to shot differences in velocity.
As for cleaning, I treat .22LR rimfires like cast iron - I don't believe in cleaning the hell out of them. In fact I rarely clean a barrel anymore. On a self loader it's the action that gets cleaned on my rifles.
It is the well I paid more so it has to be better. But there is much ego with that mentality. As there are many that look down on others.Not alwasy true. Put it in a pretty box, sell it for a pretty price, it will shoot better for some based only on Placebo effect. LOL.
Look at 6.5 creed, there were two cartridges that would fit in a shorter action, one in the longer action, two that can out perform it, yet marketing and hype as many convinced that is it the epitomy.
With ammo, there can be a difference, but sometimes we shoot better because we think we have the solution.
Another accuracy issue with 10/22s is the single bolt mounting. I noticed my action was able to rock in the stock.I was never happy with the accuracy of my Ruger SR-22. I bought a pre-fit McGowen barrel from Mystic Precision “Jerry” years ago and it cut the group sizes in half. Its an exact drop in fit for the SR-22, not sure if they still make them anymore. Ruger 10-22’s aren’t noted for great accuracy right out of the box, the first thing most people do is a barrel swap. Very easy to do, might be something you may want to consider at some point.
I would generally agree, more consistency, but not always brand to brand speaking. Tac 22 gives me accuracy that I could not have dreamed about 10 years ago, but now I treat as a baseline. CCI SV never shoots as well; Aguilla SV never groups as tight as CCI. SK Std+ only shows a slight advantage if you measure your 10 shot group with a precission caliper, just to eyeball, it is virtually impossible to see any difference. Same holds for*Generally speaking* I find better accuracy with standard velocity ammunition.
Or perhaps it's because you generally don't find SV in bulk boxes.
But I don't think that I've ever had anything go to extremes like that. Not even the crappy Remington Goldens, where I could hear the extreme shot to shot differences in velocity.
As for cleaning, I treat .22LR rimfires like cast iron - I don't believe in cleaning the hell out of them. In fact I rarely clean a barrel anymore. On a self loader it's the action that gets cleaned on my rifles.
I would agree, but not saying that someday one might find one lighter or more likely heavier, that would shoota bit better.All the best performing ammo is made with 40 grain bullets. Stick with 40 grain ammo and look for better performing varieties.
From Shooting Sports USA:
"Norma introduced at SHOT Show 2023 what is perhaps the first truly new development in match grade .22 LR ammo, a patented 43-grain boat-tail bullet specifically intended for really extended ranges exceeding 300 yards.
Certainly, the first question that barges into any competitor’s mind is, “How on earth do you put a boat tail on a heel-base bullet?” Norma calls the configuration a “rocket tail.” Picture hollowing out the base of the bullet’s heel and raising the center of the hollow into a cone that reaches to the base of the bullet, and you’ve got the concept. Mike said the configuration results in a flatter and more stable bullet trajectory, even though starting velocity is slightly supersonic at about 1,165 f.p.s.
The first true innovation in .22 LR match-grade ammo, Norma’s XTREME LR-22 boasts an unusual “rocket tail” bullet.
While hollowing the base would lighten a bullet’s weight, Norma extended the nose of the bullet to bring the weight up to 43 grains, compared to a typical and traditional match bullet weight of 40 grains. The increased weight, of course, results in lesser sensitivity to crosswind.

Here we go again!! This thread is about lack lustre performance from rimfire ammo. Nothing about egos or people looking down on anybody! When you find a good lot number for a particular ammo then buy as much of it as you can. As stated sooh many times, price doesn’t guarantee performance but GENRALY better results are achieved with sub sonic target ammo! If an individual buys higher end ammo that doesn’t mean they look down on anyone and Im not sure how you come to your conclusion. Many shooters have different requirements out of their firearms hence the difference in varieties and price. Do you think someone that has a nice sports car or pickup truck looks down at you cuz of your vehicle? Kindah a ####ty way to go thru life thinking so! I drive a 2016 Toyota so that means people look down at me? If they do I don’t really care and neither should you.It is the well I paid more so it has to be better. But there is much ego with that mentality. As there are many that look down on others.
Your assumptions about this brand performs better than this brand which performs better than this is misleading. Lot numbers are what matters. You could shoot five lots of the same ammo and none might shoot the same as the other! None of the five might shoot well either! You might find a lot of Tac22 that shoots extremely well and the next three not so much with probably variance between all of them. The only real way is like Jerry stated, Send lead downrange!I would generally agree, more consistency, but not always brand to brand speaking. Tac 22 gives me accuracy that I could not have dreamed about 10 years ago, but now I treat as a baseline. CCI SV never shoots as well; Aguilla SV never groups as tight as CCI. SK Std+ only shows a slight advantage if you measure your 10 shot group with a precission caliper, just to eyeball, it is virtually impossible to see any difference. Same holds for
I would agree, but not saying that someday one might find one lighter or more likely heavier, that would shoota bit better.
I would try this stuff if I could find it:
View attachment 1131683
Not alwasy true. Put it in a pretty box, sell it for a pretty price, it will shoot better for some based only on Placebo effect. LOL.
Look at 6.5 creed, there were two cartridges that would fit in a shorter action, one in the longer action, two that can out perform it, yet marketing and hype as many convinced that is it the epitomy.
With ammo, there can be a difference, but sometimes we shoot better because we think we have the solution.



























