Brigade Makasi MK15 We're back in business!!
- Thread starter Painkillers
- Start date
The Makasi Lower Receiver is NOT compatible with an AR15 Upper Receiver, full-stop. There is no rear Take-Down Pin on the Makasi system to mate with an AR Upper Receiver.
Anyone who thinks that the Makasi is an AR derivative just because it utilizes AR parts for high-wear items such as the Bolt-Carrier Group as well as the Trigger Mechanism and Ejection Port Cover are off-base. The Makasi design predates Bill C21 and the Assault-Style Weapons evergreen definition. Hence the 5-round STANAG pattern Magazine.
This thread has taken a turn into dangerous territory with the confusing talk of Legion products being AR15s. The RCMP have determined that the Makasi specifically, is a unique design, no doubt based on the complete incompatibilty between the Upper and Lower Receivers of the two platforms as well as other specific features. Please give the speculation a rest, lest we plant false ideas in the heads of Poly, et-al....
The Makasi is what it is - a unique rifle which pre-dates, and therefore escapes the anti-semi-auto evergreen definition of an Assault-Style Firearm. It has been determined by the RCMP to be a NR rifle in Canada under extant legislation. Let's leave all of the innuendo and negative speculation about Brigade's other products to Poly and their ilk. We just need to quietly await the arrival of the Makasi later this year. Once we have them in hand, we can speculate to our hearts' content. But let's not kill the deal before it can come to fruition with foolish, loose talk of AR-equivalency.
Anyone who thinks that the Makasi is an AR derivative just because it utilizes AR parts for high-wear items such as the Bolt-Carrier Group as well as the Trigger Mechanism and Ejection Port Cover are off-base. The Makasi design predates Bill C21 and the Assault-Style Weapons evergreen definition. Hence the 5-round STANAG pattern Magazine.
This thread has taken a turn into dangerous territory with the confusing talk of Legion products being AR15s. The RCMP have determined that the Makasi specifically, is a unique design, no doubt based on the complete incompatibilty between the Upper and Lower Receivers of the two platforms as well as other specific features. Please give the speculation a rest, lest we plant false ideas in the heads of Poly, et-al....
The Makasi is what it is - a unique rifle which pre-dates, and therefore escapes the anti-semi-auto evergreen definition of an Assault-Style Firearm. It has been determined by the RCMP to be a NR rifle in Canada under extant legislation. Let's leave all of the innuendo and negative speculation about Brigade's other products to Poly and their ilk. We just need to quietly await the arrival of the Makasi later this year. Once we have them in hand, we can speculate to our hearts' content. But let's not kill the deal before it can come to fruition with foolish, loose talk of AR-equivalency.
Last edited:
apexanimal
CGN Regular
- Location
- Vancouver Island
This isnt mathematically possible, been covered by people with higher than double digit iqs many times.
Yes, it's frankly not feasible. From my experience, the RCMP were using this system to make sure people who got themselves into hot water were no longer in possession of their NR firearms. This was done to ensure that they had lawfully disposed of it. Never heard anything about an NR-gone-prohib being requested via the system. Since unlimited NR firearms can be transferred inside the 90 day window, any sale you ever made a reference for could be for 1, 2, 100, 1000 firearms. Individuals are not required to retain any ledger, businesses are under legislation. There are likely over 250,000 of these (possibly more). It only works from importer/distributor to business ledger to the first individual it was sold to. After that, following the chain of custody becomes difficult just through the passage of time.
Anyways, if you imagine a world where everyone has 3-5 individual to individual reference numbers in and out, it could functionally be with any license holder in the country.
CCFR lies / implies (depending on what you want to think about them). There's no "back door registry", you don't have do be very smart to understand it, you just need to know the law and know how ppl buy and sell guns. CCFR attacked several anti-gun initiatives, because they were not coming from CCFR. CCFR wasted our loyalty resource and time on useless court battles and now looking to solidify all bans in the court. CCFR is at best a controversial org.
Last edited:
Most people describe objects based on what they are familiar with. it is a bit of a human cognitive thing.
People really over complicated things and tried too hard to convince themselves one way or the other. Buy the thing and or don't buy thing. At the end, 1) he Man gonna come take it or they don't. 2) And you give it away or you don't - 3) this goes back to buy it or not buy it.
This. And then those 18 inch barrels weren't an exact fit to the gas systems. and then just before the ban people's gas trunnion blocks started cracking cause stacking aftermarket parts onto a system with blitz R&D is bad. Oh ya no warranty.
Tarrantula
CGN frequent flyer
- Location
- Parts unknown
Yes, this
Is it not of prohibited AR-10 design?
They were discussing "*the BM-22LR, not the Makasi*"
If you have multiple sales recorded after purchasing it there is no way for them to know whether that rifle was one you sold without contacting all of those you sold to and hoping they tell them which model firearm they purchased.
They will start at the source (the dealer), then work their way via reference #s all the way to the owner. They are pushing hard to ban everything. Wouldn’t be surprised if they go this route.
