SxS or O/U???

dannymat

Regular
Rating - 100%
6   0   0
I'm new to the shooting world.
About a month ago I bought my first gun, a Mossberg 930.
But..... I've caught the fever, so now I want a gun just for sport shooting.
So what's better, pros and cons, brands, etc etc etc

Side by Side VS Over Under
 
A good sxs will cost you more that a good o/u. Though once you start with the sxs addiction you'll find ways of justifying the costs very easily :). You really need to handle as many in your budget range as possible before you decide. Find one that speaks to you and you'll be happy for a long while. How much are you willing to spend?
 
Dannymat, more info is needed. What does "sport shooting" mean to you? Clays? Uplands? Waterfowl? What you intend to shoot will influence the decision.

Sharptail
 
By sport shooting i meant clays.
My Mossberg will be my hunting gun.

And budget ...... something affordable, i dont want to break the bank, but i dont want to put down a dollar value either because i dont know what the going rates are
 
For use on clays, get an U/O. You'll find a suitable gun much more easily than trying to find a SxS appropriate for trap or sporting clays. You might even want to look at good auto. You can shoot a lot of ammunition at clay targets, the quality of the gun does make a difference. Don't skimp too much.

Sharptail
 
Many shotguns with a longer barrel like 28" and modifly choke are able to do trap shoot really good, some go for o/u for more traditonal look but many go for semi auto. If you only shoot single like me, even a single shot break open cheap gun can do the job. Price wise for s/s and o/u are huge different range. Beretta make both beautiful s/s and o/u but will cost you both arm and leg. Savage Steven, Stogear Condor and Baikal make very affordable over and under. A good way to do is go to a trap range and ask your fellow gun club member to try their gun out.

Trigun
 
SXS's are for hunting. O/U's are for Clay sport. If you want something that does both for a reasonable price buy a 391 Beretta.
 
I got a sxs from tradeex. It's nice and light, and a great pointing game gun. I shot a round of clay with it last weekend and almost killed myself. I prefer shooting auto, especially for those 100 rds clays.
 
That's a loaded question. Have you handled either of them? I can tell you in the lower cost guns that my dad's Baikal SXS feels way different in hand than my Baikal O/U. I much prefer the balance and feel of the O/U (so does my dad), but that's just this particular brand and our opinion.
 
For use on clays, get an U/O. You'll find a suitable gun much more easily than trying to find a SxS appropriate for trap or sporting clays. You might even want to look at good auto. You can shoot a lot of ammunition at clay targets, the quality of the gun does make a difference. Don't skimp too much. Sharptail

SXS's are for hunting. O/U's are for Clay sport. If you want something that does both for a reasonable price buy a 391 Beretta.

The above sums it up pretty well - keep in view that your firearm will have more wear and tear due to range use. Therefore, from a perspective of long term value, durability, performance etc......

O/U = Beretta/Browning (higher price point; ease of maintenance)

O/U = SKB if you can find a used one in very good condition (quality product, reasonable price)

Auto = Beretta 391 (excellent deal at a much lower price point; need to be a bit more diligent in cleaning)

It would be best if you are able to handle (even shoot) both and determine your preference. As for the sxs, for a variety of reasons it doesn't 'adequately' fit into the equation where extensive range use may be involved.

A shotgun, obviously, has to fit to yield the best results :)
 
Last edited:
For clays I prefer an o/u or semi. For hunting a sxs or o/u.

There are more options for o/u on the market in a wider price range. Sxs aren't as common.
 
like them both and cannot rcommend either to anyone, it is a personal choice.
most shooters find it easier to shoot an O/U, and the removable chokes ar usually easier to find on an O/U than SXS.
Weatherby sells one however that does have them.
Cat
 
Last edited:
I'm a much bigger proponent of SXS's than U/O's. However, most shotgun varieties are more suited to certain purposes. For clay sports, I prefer an U/O, both for the added weight and for the narrower sight picture. Single triggers make more sense for clays, whereas double triggers are much better for hunting.

The extra weight is important - it helps smooth out your swing and absorbs energy to reduce recoil. U/O's are built to withstand the pounding from thousands of rounds a year.

Good SxS's tend to be lighter and livelier - qualities that are highly desireable in the field, but less so for clay sports.

Tradex has some U/O's in good condition for very reasonable prices. There's 2 or 3 Baikals with good bores and chokes suitable for clays. These are solidly built guns that won't let you down, but they may not keep you happy in the long run. Baikal is not highly regarded by many, but not because of reliability issues or anything like that. More so because, to keep to the low price points, they've sacrificed weight and weight distribution characteristics and final fit and finish effort.

Most clay shooters eventually want removable chokes, better balance, and often times exchangeable trigger groups and higher quality wood and metal in general. Still, a low end U/O is a good way to get your "feet wet" in the sport. The initial investment is modest and you can get your money out of such guns later on (provided you don't pay too much at the outset), should you get serious about clays and want to move up to better equipment in the hope of improving by one or two hits per round.

One thing I would advise is that, whatever you choose, you stick to it. Changing from pumps to U/O's, and SXS's is a sure way to prevent yourself from ever developing a smooth swing and a good rhythm.
 
Back
Top Bottom