Being in the process of replacing the guns I sold off last year, I'm in need of an optic for my tactical/long range rifle. I was intent on an IOR identical to the one I had, but after a candid albeit brief discussion with Peter Dobson, I'm rethinking that.
I'd like to hear opinions on NF vs. Leupold Mk4, preferably from those who have shot both.
I prefer the IOR MP8 reticle, so in the Leup it would be the TMR, and in the NF I'm not sure of the number, but there is one similar.
Tell me which you would buy, and WHY exactly you'd choose that brand.
FWIW, the rifle will be a .308 and shots mostly between 300-1000y/m. The IOR I loved was the 3-18X42 with the MP8 reticle.
I'd like to hear opinions on NF vs. Leupold Mk4, preferably from those who have shot both.
I prefer the IOR MP8 reticle, so in the Leup it would be the TMR, and in the NF I'm not sure of the number, but there is one similar.
Tell me which you would buy, and WHY exactly you'd choose that brand.

FWIW, the rifle will be a .308 and shots mostly between 300-1000y/m. The IOR I loved was the 3-18X42 with the MP8 reticle.




















































