130gr TTSX

.

The 30 cal 130grain should be compared to the 100grain .277....They have the same sectional density and all else being equal they will penetrate the same.

Still like the choice?

Sure. I wouldn't think twice about taking a moose with a 100 grain .277 diameter TTSX bullet. They don't make one, but I'd use the 110 grain. Its about bullet construction and volocity when using a bullet of the X/TSX/TTSX design. I use the 100 grain TSX's out of my 25/06 AI and would use that on moose as well. I know the 100 grain .257 bullet will have a higher SD, than a 100 grain .277 but the weight of the bullet would still make a lot of guys turn their nose's up at it. Would I use a conventional cup and core bullet of the same specs on bigger boned, thicker hide game, no probably not....unless the perfect angle, and situation was presented. Any bullet of the above mentioned to the CNS is a downed animal.
 
Sure. I wouldn't think twice about taking a moose with a 100 grain .277 diameter TTSX bullet. They don't make one, but I'd use the 110 grain. Its about bullet construction and volocity when using a bullet of the X/TSX/TTSX design. I use the 100 grain TSX's out of my 25/06 AI and would use that on moose as well. I know the 100 grain .257 bullet will have a higher SD, than a 100 grain .277 but the weight of the bullet would still make a lot of guys turn their nose's up at it. Would I use a conventional cup and core bullet of the same specs on bigger boned, thicker hide game, no probably not....unless the perfect angle, and situation was presented. Any bullet of the above mentioned to the CNS is a downed animal.


But they do make a 110gr TTSX in .277 I emailed Barnes before I ordered the 110gr or the 130 for my .270 and they said if moose was in the equation they would go with the 130gr. just passing info along.
 
Bronco and others,

While I understand the little TSX's will most likely work my question is why?

Do you really think the extra velocity is going to make that long shot for you?
 
Last edited:
Bronco and others,

While I understand the little TSX's will most likely work my question is why?

Do you really think the extra velocity is going to make that long shot for you?

Why?

If the bullet and cartridge combination are fully capable of doing it, why not?

As to your second question.....no not at all. I'm a gun nut, and have many many toys to play with. I never considered using the 270 wsm for moose when I ordered it, because of the other rifles in my collection. But I know the combination of a TSX/TTSX in any of the weights produced would be deadly. You have to know your gun to make the shots, regardless if it's volocity is 2000 fps, or 3500 fps.
 
At 450 yards, a 130gr TTSX @ 3500 is 19 of drop

A 180gr TSX @ 2950 is 26" of drop

Only about 150 ft/lbs of difference in energy (if you care about that)

not that meaningful, if you use a RF and adjust your scope for drop, as I would do, butthere it is...:)
 
These 130gr TTSX keep impressing me...

n526315515_1427166_3587.jpg



200 yards, the 130 gr TTSX made a nice cloverleaf.

The 130gr TSX did pretty good, too. I shot 2 bullets in one hole, then blew the 3rd shot. I actually said "####" as the trigger broke. Went to the bench, loaded one more round, and it went back into the group.:)

Next I zeroed the rifle using this drop chart as a guide, and came pretty close, although my velocity is a bit higher.

130 @ 3500 f/s
+/- 3" ~ 333 yards, 285y zero

100- +2.3
200- +2.7
300 -1"
350 -4.5" 1.25moa
400 -9" 2.25moa
450 -15" 3.5moa
500 -23" 4.5 moa

I've got 22 bullets left, not counting the dummy round I made. Enough to go hunting until some more show up.:)
 
Not exactly what this thread is about but here is a 7MM 120g TSX with a 175g Partition. The 120g TSX will out penetrate the 175g partition both at max velocity's from a 7mag, but does so on account of a smaller wound channel (material removed)



Something to remember for those tying to extrapolate this pic and compare to the 308" bullets, the 7mm 175g Noslers have the partition more rearward than the 308" partitions.






100_0696.jpg
 
Last edited:
Gatehouse,

I wonder how these little bullets group at long range (350-400 yards) as compared to 180's or even 200's?

When I get my 338 Edge back from the 'smith I'll compare 160, 225, and 250 grains TSX at 350 yards (my longest shot within a few minutes drive).

I could also make a similar comparison with a 375 Ultra.

What do you think?
 
Kinda part of the topic. I tried walking 180grain ### through my Rem700P and they just won't group.

I'll be trying out 165's this week.
 
Gatehouse,

I wonder how these little bullets group at long range (350-400 yards) as compared to 180's or even 200's?

When I get my 338 Edge back from the 'smith I'll compare 160, 225, and 250 grains TSX at 350 yards (my longest shot within a few minutes drive).

I could also make a similar comparison with a 375 Ultra.

What do you think?


Longest I've shot the 130gr TTSX at was our gong, at 340 yards. Didin't check for groups, but I banged it well, and that is a kill on a deer....

Shot 140gr TSX from my 7RM at close to 500 yards and it had no problems wastign milk jugs.

I don't really care abotu groups out far, just that it will hit the target, that is the size of a deer vitals...
 
Here is my gong at 420yds, using 125gr Ballistic Tips

n526315515_1462356_8911.jpg



Blurry pic, but you can see the 2 hits on the left side of gong, at 500 yards. Wind picked up and I didn't notice, thought it was blowing straight away...anyway, I hit 2x and missed once, but the 2 that hit couldn't be more than a couple inches apart. So, I guess the light bullets group okay at longer ranges.:)

n526315515_1462376_3125.jpg
 
Apparently Gatehouse is cutting edge....:dancingbanana:;)

Federal Premium® Partners with Barnes® on New Hyper-Velocity Load
May 18th, 2008 · No Comments
Federal Premium® and Barnes® Bullets have a reputation of bringing hunters some of the best bullet and load combinations available. Continuing this tradition, the new Barnes® Tipped Triple-Shock X-Bullet™ offerings feature a Delrin tip and hyper-velocities for extremely flat shooting. Available fall of 2008.

This lead-free bullet is a proven performer in the field, and offers improved expansion and deep penetration. The new Barnes offering is an extremely accurate bullet specially designed to reduce pressure and barrel fouling. Its all-copper design provides high weight retention to bring game down hard and the new tip gives it flatter trajectories.

“Barnes has always been a great partner,” said Ammunition Brand Manager Rick Stoeckel. “Their products are proven performers, and the Tipped Triple-Shock is no exception. The new tip makes the all-copper projectile a flat-shooting, accurate round, yet keeps the high weight retention the Triple-Shock is known for.”

Another added bonus of the Tipped Triple-Shock is that the new loads feature lighter weight bullets pushed to high-velocities—up to 3500 fps. Because of the all-copper design and 100% weight retention of the Triple-Shock, lighter bullets do the work of the big boys and allow for higher speeds. These offerings will get the bullet downrange quickly—meaning more energy on target and impressive terminal performance.

Available in 2008:

Part No. Description
P270WSMF 270 WSM 110-gr Tipped Triple-Shock 3500 fps
P270Q 270 Win 110-gr Tipped Triple-Shock 3400 fps
P300WSMK 300 WSM 130-gr Tipped Triple-Shock 3500 fps
P300WL 300 Win Mag 130-gr Tipped Triple-Shock 3500 fps

For more information on the Tipped Triple-Shock, as well as the complete Federal Premium lineup, visit www.federalpremium.com
 
Hmmm. Usually the factory numbers are a little opimistic. Your .300WSM is 24" or 22" barrel? I wonder what the factory uses for a test barrel or rifle?
Anyway you slice it, 3500 FPS is pretty kickass
 
My 300 WM with a 29" tube was squirting out 200 gr NPTs at 3100 and some 180 NPT Protected Points at 3450. I think there was something hinky with that last load but further testing will determine if it was an over charge or not. Minimum chamber plus the extra barrel shouldn't give that much difference.

I want to try some 180 Accubonds, but wasn't thinking that far ahead when I was in Calgary!
 
Gatehouse did you shoot a bear with the 130gr BarnesTSX ? I can't see any posts on it. Would like to know how it performed? I have some 130 gr Barnes and am ready to start loading.
 
Back
Top Bottom