dude your killing me.
There are only 2 places on the rifle that give you a solid consistant mounting position and thats the rear sight leaf and the right side of the reciever. Since 90% of the rounds fired from 58/858 rifles are corrosive removing the upper hand guard for cleaning after a day of shooting is a must and for me this puts the hand guard mounts in question as there will always be some play although rifles will vary and the return to zero will bit a bit off although your milage may vary.
The scout mount replacing the rear sight leaf is a nice solid mount but its really only good for red dot types or possibly one of the mid eye relief scopes like the Burris or Leupold scout scope offerings. The drawbacks are limited magnified optics selection, you lose the irons so if the optic fails it kills your day and you have to modify the upper hand guard in order to clean the gas system. I have never used one on my 858 but have used one on my m44 and although solid, it did shift over time (there is a lot more recoil involved with the m44 so milage may vary). I'd take this option over an upper hand guard rail but thats just me.
The way the 58/858 is designed it lends itself best to the SVD type optics mounting for magnified optics. This system allows the shooter to retain the use of iron sights and the Russians have mounts with weaver rails or scope rings so you can mount pretty well any optic you want. Unfortunately the russian red dots are designed to be mounted closer to the eye then the POSPs so with the current side rail offerings once you commit to one eye relief you are kinda stuck there.
Another drawback is offset, the russian optics untill the last few years have pretty well all been left offset. My theory is that they did this so the shooter could always easily fall back on the iron sights if needed. Since we aren't likely to ever use our rifles in combat this is somewhat lost on most shooters. That said I'm left eye dominant and I can still comfortably use the SVD setup cause the rifle is rather thin. Almost every adaptation of the SVD mount rail that I've seen builds it out even further then is was deisgned to be on the SVD only making a small problem a bit worst. I think if I used some of the rifles I've seen on the wire I wouldn't find the positioning comfortable. Oh yea and the SVD rails on their own don't fit on the side of the rifle so you NEED to fabricate an adapter to make it work.
The real drawback is casing ejection; unlike the AK or SVD which eject to the right, the 58 ejects almost straight up (consensus is the 1:00 position) meaning that anything mounted above the ejection port like a scope gets hit with spent casings which can damage the scope.
If only somebody could make it better...
There are only 2 places on the rifle that give you a solid consistant mounting position and thats the rear sight leaf and the left side of the reciever. Since 90% of the rounds fired from 58/858 rifles are corrosive removing the upper hand guard for cleaning after a day of shooting is a must and for me this puts the hand guard mounts in question as there will always be some play although rifles will vary and the return to zero will bit a bit off although your milage may vary.
The scout mount replacing the rear sight leaf is a nice solid mount but its really only good for red dot types or possibly one of the mid eye relief scopes like the Burris or Leupold scout scope offerings. The drawbacks are limited magnified optics selection, you lose the irons so if the optic fails it kills your day and you have to modify the upper hand guard in order to clean the gas system. I have never used one on my 858 but have used one on my m44 and although solid, it did shift over time (there is a lot more recoil involved with the m44 so milage may vary). I'd take this option over an upper hand guard rail but thats just me.
The way the 58/858 is designed it lends itself best to the SVD type optics mounting for magnified optics. This system allows the shooter to retain the use of iron sights and the Russians have mounts with weaver rails or scope rings so you can mount pretty well any optic you want. Unfortunately the russian red dots are designed to be mounted closer to the eye then the POSPs so with the current side rail offerings once you commit to one eye relief you are kinda stuck there.
Another drawback is offset, the russian optics untill the last few years have pretty well all been left offset. My theory is that they did this so the shooter could always easily fall back on the iron sights if needed. Since we aren't likely to ever use our rifles in combat this is somewhat lost on most shooters. That said I'm left eye dominant and I can still comfortably use the SVD setup cause the rifle is rather thin. Almost every adaptation of the SVD mount rail that I've seen builds it out even further then is was deisgned to be on the SVD only making a small problem a bit worst. I think if I used some of the rifles I've seen on the wire I wouldn't find the positioning comfortable. Oh yea and the SVD rails on their own don't fit on the side of the rifle so you NEED to fabricate an adapter to make it work.
The real drawback is casing ejection; unlike the AK or SVD which eject to the right, the 58 ejects almost straight up (consensus is the 1:00 position) meaning that anything mounted above the ejection port like a scope gets hit with spent casings which can damage the scope.
If only somebody could make it better...
There are only 2 places on the rifle that give you a solid consistant mounting position and thats the rear sight leaf and the right side of the reciever.
What do you guys think?
I've been looking for a solution to that problem since I recieved mine. I'm just thinking out loud, but, is the rear dust cover (stamped metal) be strong enough to hold a small DR optic style red dot? Or could a piece be machined to replace it? Everything seems very well built on the CZ858 but a stamped dust cover? What do you guys think?
-Jason
So there seem to be a few options out there. What are you guys findings as the best option for:
1. Red dots?
2. Scopes?
Any new ideas coming down the pipeline?