weaver bases

[wonksy]

just wondering if standard aluminum weaver bases and rings are strong enough to handle a 300 wsm. i'm guessing it shouldnt be a problem cause these bases and rings have been around for yrs and are seen on alot of 300 win mags.

 

[SuperCub]

I've used them on several 375H&Hs w/o a problem, ever!

I like them. Simple, dependable, versatile and priced right.




.

 

[pharaoh2]

X2. I've had them on a couple .300 Win mags and 1 .338 win mag. Pay more attention to your rings. I like Weavers for that too, as their simple.

 

[H4831]

X3, bases AND rings.

 

[gunrunner100]

If you're worried, buy the Weaver GS rings (Grand Slam). They're all steel, and X4 on the rings. People have a tendency to cheap out on the rings.

 

[shortaction]

Love the Weaver Bases and top them with Burris Signature Rings.

 

[ryanloco]

Love the Weaver Bases and top them with Burris Signature Rings.

X 2 - great setup !

 

[NAA]

Love the Weaver Bases and top them with Burris Signature Rings.

X3

Don't use traditional Weaver rings anymore. Steel Burris Z rings or B-Square Lynx rings for me.

 

[chuck nelson]

My favorite "weaver style" setup is Burris/Leupold/Warne steel bases with Burris Z rings.

I prefer the one piece Tally's

 

[manbearpig]

aluminum weaver bases are fine, although they wear faster than steel so in the long run i still think steel is a better investment if youre going to be removing your scope frequently.

as for rings - inexpensive aluminum rings suck.
at the least get a set of burris zee rings - theyre only $20-25.