Wisconsin’s 3rd safest deer season, only 9 shot!

ckc123

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
16   0   0
Location
north of the gta
Wisconsin’s 3rd safest deer season, only 9 shot!

Wow.. :sniper::wave:




http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/article/20081201/GPG0101/81201160/1978


With nine accidental shootings, Wisconsin’s tradition-steeped deer hunt was the third safest on record, the state Department of Natural Resources said today.

A 48-year-old Appleton man died after a partner shot him during a deer drive, and eight others were wounded — four of them with self-inflicted shots in the leg or foot, said Tim Lawhern, the agency’s safety administrator.

But the nine-day hunt was safe overall, Lawhern said: “We are well below the 10-year average of incidents for the season. The 10-year average is 15.”

The DNR measures safety based on the number of shooting incidents, not the number of fatalities.

The nine shooting victims were all males, ages 13 to 62, Lawhern said. Five of the shootings occurred during deer drives.

he number of deer killed won’t be known until Tuesday. The 642,419 licensed hunters had until late today to register deer with the DNR from the hunt that ended Sunday.

The total, however, was expected to be less than last year’s 343,644, partly because hunters registered 133,828 deer after the opening weekend, 22 percent fewer than a year ago, the DNR said. The opening weekend is often a barometer of hunting success.

....

The most dangerous hunting season in recent times was 1987, when eight hunters died in 53 shooting accidents, Lawhern said.


...


Wisconsin hunts have become safer since the state started its hunter education program in 1967, requiring training in gun safety and proper gun handling. Safety also improved once hunters were required to wear blaze orange, making them easier to see.

..
 
9 people shot is quite a few, especially for being the 3rd safest state to hunt in. My question is, how does Canada pan out against the US when it comes to hunting mishaps?
 
9 people shot is quite a few, especially for being the 3rd safest state to hunt in. My question is, how does Canada pan out against the US when it comes to hunting mishaps?

The article doesn't say Wisconsin is the 3rd safest state. What is says is that 2008 was the 3rd safest year on record in Wisconsin.

In Canada, we probably do a slight bit better than Wisconsin or other states, because our population density is lower, and hunters don't have to be crammed together so tightly. Stats like these are meaningless unless they're converted to a rate per 100,000 of population (or hunters). The Canadian number would be lower simply because of our lower population but, as I stated, the rate is likely lower as well.
 
I'd bet you take "642,419 licensed hunters" and compare to "642,419 car drivers" and the accident rate would be lower for the hunters. but for some reason hunters get a worse reputation for the accidents that occur. Just food for thought, not trying to make excuses for careless gun handling.
 
I'd bet you take "642,419 licensed hunters" and compare to "642,419 car drivers" and the accident rate would be lower for the hunters. but for some reason hunters get a worse reputation for the accidents that occur. Just food for thought, not trying to make excuses for careless gun handling.

X2, If someone gets shmupped in a motor vehicle collision it's a statistic. If a hunter gets shot it's a public safety concern.
 
Wow.. :sniper::wave:

The 642,419 licensed hunters had until late today to register deer with the DNR from the hunt that ended Sunday.
..

That's a lot of hunters in one state. I'd bet there aren't that many hunters in all of Canada.

Ontario has 175,000 deer hunters.
 
The article doesn't say Wisconsin is the 3rd safest state. What is says is that 2008 was the 3rd safest year on record in Wisconsin.

whoops, read the original post a little wrong. I haven't heard anything on the news yet about any hunting accidents around here. I actually haven't heard of any in a few years. So I guess there cant be that many... Or maybe its just our gov't stealing the spotlight
 
I'd bet you take "642,419 licensed hunters" and compare to "642,419 car drivers" and the accident rate would be lower for the hunters. but for some reason hunters get a worse reputation for the accidents that occur. Just food for thought, not trying to make excuses for careless gun handling.

"for some reason" - the reason being political expediency.

Bathtubs are statistically more dangerous than hunting rifles.

BAN BATHTUBS!!! :runaway: (As if the libtards would ever even think that thought. But, if they weren't lying scum hypocrites and they were genuinely concerned for people's safety, that's exactly what they'd do - or at least stop picking on law abiding gun owners.)
 
The excuse I have been told when I compare Firearms to Cars is that "People don't need guns for everyday use" And actually that one kinda stumps me, how should I respond to that? Take the bus?
 
sounds like a lot at first glance, but what are the adjusted rates for canada?

afterall, it says over 600,000 hunters, and 340,000 deer taken.
 
The excuse I have been told when I compare Firearms to Cars is that "People don't need guns for everyday use" And actually that one kinda stumps me, how should I respond to that? Take the bus?

People don't "need" cars either. But, the benefits of car ownership in this country are seen as outweighing the risks. Well, I'm here to tell you guns have only one purpose - protecting lives. The benefits of gun ownership also far outweigh the risks. The comparison is not only valid, it's compelling.
 
the couple times I deer hunted in wisconsin made me a bit nervous even though we were on private land. not 15 seconds would go by without hearing shots. far cry from the places I hunt in canada where most days you won't hear another shot
 
Buck fever is alive and well in the state of Wisconsin. :D Either that or a lot of deer vision is happenning. Can you imagine how many near misses they must have.
 
The excuse I have been told when I compare Firearms to Cars is that "People don't need guns for everyday use" And actually that one kinda stumps me, how should I respond to that? Take the bus?

Many people in rural Canada DO need guns for everyday use. Ask any farmer with livestock and crops that need protecting from varmints, or ask a trapper. Or aboriginal subsistence hunters. Or security personnel. Or Geologists in remote areas.
Or ask me, who is a farmer and who pretty much exclusively feeds his family wild meat. 98% of our Canadian land mass is outside of large urban centres, and I'm sick and tired of city people telling me what I do or don't "need"!
 
25 years of gun handling never seen or had a gun "accident" maybe thats because my daddy beat the stupid outa me. no such thing as a gun accident just people who should not be armed
 
To put things into perspective....

Recreation Number of Participants Number of Injuries Number of injuries
Per 100,000 participants


Football 14,700,000 319,157 2,171.1
Baseball 15,400,000 321,806 2,089.6
Soccer 11,200,000 101,946 910.2
Bicycle riding 56,900,000 514,738 904.6
Skateboarding 7,500,000 65,819 869.2
Horseback riding 10,100,000 46,928 464.6
Ice skating 7,000,000 23,443 334.9
Fishing 46,500,000 65,677 141.2
Tennis 18,800,000 22,507 119.7
Golf 23,200,000 24,224 104.4
Swimming 70,500,000 65,757 93.3
Hunting 18,500,000 * 1,475 * 8.0
 
Back
Top Bottom