To put it in perspective... my ruger 10/22 cost about $1500 so a $600 scope is worth it to me because I can take that rifle with out a sandbags and just rest it on the bulk box of bullets I use and off a bench shoot 10 shot in a dime size at 25 and 50 yards so its worth it to be able to see each hit clearly on the target. I have had a few scopes a leupold rifleman about $250 on it before but it was only good at ranges out past 75 yards because it has no optical adjustment for closer ranges... I moved that to my m14 and its working great on there... leupold scopes arn't the best but there more the enough for your average shooter...
Bushnell elite 4200 or 6500 are great options too.
Paralax is the key.....
What do you guys have for variable power rimfire scope's.....looking for opinions on 3-9x32 or bigger. Something that won't break the bank. Tell me the good, bad and the ugly....
Thanks
It's going on a T/C Benchmark semi 22lr, mostly target shooting 25-100 yds, maybe hunting once in a blue moon.
Paralax is the key.....
It's going on a T/C Benchmark semi 22lr, mostly target shooting 25-100 yds, maybe hunting once in a blue moon.
I mostly agree with this, especially if your goal is to shoot 0.25" or tighter groups. But I wouldn't say parallax adjustment is essential for the average guy to shoot gophers, grouse, rabbits, tins cans and clay pigeons. Its a pita when the gophers are at different distances, and the image is so blurry. I find the non-adjustable scopes while they may be slightly less accurate (and not enough so to cause you to miss a gopher), this is only a problem for bench shooters, and the non-adjustable scopes have a wider focal plane. Near and far seem to be in focus more often. On my AO scopes, I constantly twiddling with the focus. So recognize there is a trade-off to be had.




























