New Rem VTR: What's the advantage of the 3 sided barrel?

VTR musings

I was ambushed by a used .308Win VTR with a VX3 scope by a gun dealer. I never had any intention of owning one but anyways took it to the range after at trigger job(10lb factory?) and it shot 7/8" to 3/4" five shot groups with 165s after some load development at 100 yards(no not in 90mph wind). Recoil was light, the rifle is sort of heavy and the brake or compensator? is not rifled and is larger diameter than the barrel, really 20"+2". Maybe its vented on top so you don't kick up dirt and sand when using a bi-pod on varmints. The stock is the hollow ribbed reinforced rubberish type with barrel pressure at the end of the forend via a pair of barrel centering t*ts(now removed). The same kind found on other Remington rubber stocks. This rifle didn't seem any less accurate than other sps type Remingtons I've used and the heft makes it a pleasant shooter, the noise wasn't bad either. The new trigger is really a delight to pull now that it was lightened. Many question the benefits of the design and are no doubt justified. One problem I could imagine would be headspace adjustment, how would you turn the barrel in slightly and not have to re-inlet the entire stock, not to mention having an even more f*cked up looking weapon. Anyway as far as surface area goes a circle has a triangle beat or a can of Guinness beats a Toblerone no? This would be assuming the diameter and height were the same, but the weights would be very different. Maybe a controlled experiment with two barrels with the same amount of steel per inch would give us an answer. Maybe a detailed slugging or measuring of the bore. If you want some real excitement out of this shape call up Ted G. and ask him to make you a tri barrel on a Parker Hale action. No but anyway I got my scope and still have my varmint/target Gaillard rifle that shoots better but cost more as well.. So it's now for sale(VTR) sans scope but you'll have to look on EE or I might get my peepee slaped(might have already).
 
Last edited:
Hello: This afternoon I have a chance to go to the shooting range, so I took few rifles with me and one of them is the Remington VTR .223/ picatinny rail/ LeupoldVXII 3-9x40. At 100 yard, the VTR hit the target with 1/2 an inch moa. constantly!!!. If I use a higher power scope, I am sure the grouping will be 1/2 an inch less!. Nice compact rifle to use in the field for varmints.
Thanks.
George
 
I am surprised no one has stated the obvious problem?? Where the hell do you get triangular bullets??:confused:

AKA: "Trounds". Can only be bought with the new 3 dollar coin- the 3 sided "Troonie".

Anyway, others have mentioned the reduced mass/reduced rigidity, and the reduced area/reduced cooling, but what strikes me is that cutting it to this shape is an additional step, which can only increase cost of manufacture.
 
i have one of these rem 700 vtr's in 22-250 rem and it uses round bullets and don't shoot to bad for a hunting rifle 3/4 inch @100 yards with hand loads, it may even shoot better with a better shooter.
i like the weight and the trigger is very crisp and light (adjusted to 3lbs)
seams that even though the barrel is short (20inch effective length) it only loses around 100fps with factory crap
 
i think it doesnt really matter...it is a factory barrel and will look horrible if you headspace it so i would not waste my money...build something of an Sps or something...extra money for a new shilen or good glass...who thought that a triangular barrel would be better, i fear change...lol
 
i dont know where you are getting the sights part

839-844.jpg


What happens if you were to remove one of these barrels and re chamber?

The front sight should face the "up" position right?
 
Back
Top Bottom