legally clips for my sks

i know i know...:D
clip_mag.jpg
 
Do yourself a favor and dont take anything you hear from behind the counter at wholesale sports as the gospel.
My favorite line from behind the counter of wholesale from the sales woman, while looking at a 700 in .223, was : " Sir, just to make you aware, the Canadian military is switching over to .223, so we wont be able to get ammo for it anymore. I would go for the 22.250, sir."
And away I went!
 
Please forgive my jumping in here but since we're talking about mags.... does anyone have any extra 5/20 or 5/30 'duckbill' sks mags? (or knows where I can get em?) PM plz...

Thanks!

Don't bother - they are garbage. I've never heard of ANYONE that had good luck with them. You can reload via stripper clips about ten times faster anyway.
 
thanks for the info Tootall.i thought tracer ammo was a prohib,now i see as long as it doesent explode on inpact it is not.strange laws we now have.i cant see someone who is planning a shooting spree worrying about unpinning his mag or buying unpinned mags.it seems like a law made to bother the range shooters by forcing them to keep reloading every minute or so, althought i do agree 5 rounds is enough when hunting big game.if you cant hit it with 5 shots its time to leave the woods.
 
Maybe the guy was talking about stripper clips versus the actual mag.

Stripper clips hold 10 and you can't get in trouble for that whereas the mag should be pinned to only accept 5 of the rounds.

The words "clip" and "mag" seem to be used interchangeably these days even by vendors despite being different animals. I don't give a s**t, but that could be the source of the confusion.

Their use interchangeably is incorrect and only highlights an individuals ignorance..

TDC
 
Their use interchangeably is incorrect and only highlights an individuals ignorance..

TDC

I know it is incorrect, but it very common these days. You see the error being made in magazines, on TV and in movies, even by gun vendors themselves (I have seen it repeatedly in print ads and catalogs).

I think we need to accept that the language has evolved (as it naturally does) and people are going to refer to mags as clips and vice-versa.

If you blow a gasket over it's misuse, you need to relax more - it's just not that big of a deal. :D
 
I know it is incorrect, but it very common these days. You see the error being made in magazines, on TV and in movies, even by gun vendors themselves (I have seen it repeatedly in print ads and catalogs).

I think we need to accept that the language has evolved (as it naturally does) and people are going to refer to mags as clips and vice-versa.

If you blow a gasket over it's misuse, you need to relax more - it's just not that big of a deal. :D

The proper terminology is a non issue for the ignorant or poser crowd. For the rest of us who are informed or involved in the shooting community it is an issue.

TDC
 
lets not forget about the Lee Enfields 10 round removable legal magazine.


5 rnd magazine limit applies to semi-auto rifles, not bolt action.

From CFC website:

Q. What is the maximum number of cartridges that a firearm magazine can legally hold?

As set out in Criminal Code Regulations, some large-capacity magazines are prohibited regardless of the class of firearm to which the magazines are attached. As a general rule, the maximum magazine capacity is:

5 cartridges for most magazines designed for a semi-automatic centre-fire long gun; or
10 cartridges for most handgun magazines
A large-capacity magazine is not prohibited if it has been permanently altered so that it cannot hold more than the number of cartridges allowed by law. Acceptable ways to alter a magazine are set out in the regulations.

There is no limit to the magazine capacity for semi-automatic rim-fire long guns, or for other long guns that are not semi-automatics.
 
lets not forget about the Lee Enfields 10 round removable legal magazine.

:rolleyes:

here we go again.

short story.... :D

there were semi-auto enfields that used the 10 round mags, rare and I wish I had one.

therefore all enfield mags were of the type designed for a semi-auto firearm and would have become prohibited devices. Now having that many prohibited devices everywhere in Canada would have caused the end ofthe world because we know from the CGC that guns are the blame for everything. So there was an exception made.

Oh I have never seen a semi auto enfield anywhere and I have been to the Armouries in Leeds (pattern room was not open) :(
 
The proper terminology is a non issue for the ignorant or poser crowd. For the rest of us who are informed or involved in the shooting community it is an issue.

TDC

Did you just call me ignorant or a poser because I think it is a non-issue?
 
This whole "designed for" issue is so confusing. I mean, what if somebody produced a bolt-action .223 that was AR mag compatible. Would 30-rd mags manufactured specifically for that rifle then be legal to use in an AR? What would actually distinguish these mags from any old 30-rd AR type mag?
 
This whole "designed for" issue is so confusing. I mean, what if somebody produced a bolt-action .223 that was AR mag compatible. Would 30-rd mags manufactured specifically for that rifle then be legal to use in an AR? What would actually distinguish these mags from any old 30-rd AR type mag?

be like LAR pistol mags, they are made on different tooling and are stamped "pistol mags"

if it starts its life as an AR rifle mag, than its 5 round, if it starts its life as a pistol mag, its good for 10, and if someone makes a non-semiautomatic rifle with some 30 rounders, we'll, he'll probly make himself a small fortune.

personally, its like to see something besides a bolt gun, maybe soemthing like the 7615, but with more options (barrels, sights, ect).

wasnt there a bullpup pump rifle a few years back?
 
I think the problem with "clip" being used improperly came after WWII when so many American soldiers called a magazine a clip becasue they were using Harands, which did use clips. They just started calling everything a clip.
 
Back
Top Bottom