I find that an odd sort of response. Examination of the two shells does not bear out that conclusion.
Take for granted that very few clubs allow loads with more than 1 1/8 oz. of shot, and that a good many shooters use 1 oz. loads.
Now, a 1 oz. load can be made up in a 2 3/4 inch 20 gauge hull as easily as it can be in a 12 gauge. Let's say we drive each load to 1200 feet per second, a reasonable speed for a target load with lead #8 shot.
If we have a 12 gauge gun weighing 7 1/2 lbs. and a 20 gauge weighing 6 1/2 lbs., and we shoot our 1 oz. loads through each, then the 12 gauge will deliver about 15.18 ft./lbs. of recoil energy, but the 20 gauge will deliver 18.68 ft./lbs. There are many recoil calculators on the net, go see for yourself.
In this case the poor 13 year old gets battered worse than the old man shooting the 12 gauge - it would be better if they swapped guns.
Of course one can make up 12 gauge shells with 1 1/8th oz. of shot and 20 gauge loads with 7/8th oz., and we can have a lighter 12 gauge gun and a heavier 20 gauge. If we stick to 1200 fps. and say that both guns weigh 7 lbs., then the 12 gauge will deliver 20 ft. lbs. of recoil energy compared to 12.5 for the 20 gauge. In this case the 13 year old is better off with the 20 gauge. Of course then Dad would be shooting 100 more pellets of #8 shot per load, compared to Jr.'s 20 gauge - but you want to look good in front of the kid.
My point is that there is far more to it than simply saying sub gauge guns are for kids. A lightweight 20 shooting heavy loads can be a punishing gun, while a heavy 12 shooting club loads can be a real pussycat. Think about the gun and the loads rather than making sweeping (and often incorrect) statements.
Sharptail
Sharptail couldn't have give my oppion anny better.





















































