CanuckShooter
CGN frequent flyer
I am looking for some opinions/experiences anyone here has had with their 870 Express. I currently own a 70's Wingmaster, and thought it's nice and smooth, it just doesn't have what I want.
- it has a fixed full choke, no possibility of using rem-chokes (which I read is not good in combination with steel shot)
- it only has a 2.75" chamber (I like the option of the 3" chamber for hunting possibly in the very near future)
- the barrel is plain, not vent ribbed
- it's nice.... but it just doesn't feel 'new'.... I like new as opposed to used
So anyways... those are the reasons I feel I want to sell it.
I am considering an 870 Express to replace it, as the Express is all I can afford right now. Here are the reasons why I am considering an Express:
- this will be a range and probably hunting gun, therefore I don't want to have to worry, obsess and have a heart attack fearing a scratch on an $850 shotgun.... I want USE it
- I am not someone who gives a crap about "pretty" guns, I am very utilitarian/minimalist (I am a Glock lover) so the mirror smooth finish on the receiver of a Wingmaster literally means nothing to me, and to be honest it actually turns me away since scratches will show up on it a lot easier
- the Express accepts and comes with Rem-Chokes
In short, my only concern is durability and reliability. Aside from the plastic trigger guard, is there ANY reason to believe that a Wingmaster would last longer, or be more reliable than an Express (after the Express has been nicely broken in that is)? Are there any parts in the Express that are made of a lower quality/strength material?
PS - Does the Express come with a Remington Super-Cell recoil pad? Also, does the Express handle only up to 3" shells, or does it do 3.5" as well? The Remington site sucks, it doesn't say.
Thanks!
- it has a fixed full choke, no possibility of using rem-chokes (which I read is not good in combination with steel shot)
- it only has a 2.75" chamber (I like the option of the 3" chamber for hunting possibly in the very near future)
- the barrel is plain, not vent ribbed
- it's nice.... but it just doesn't feel 'new'.... I like new as opposed to used
So anyways... those are the reasons I feel I want to sell it.
I am considering an 870 Express to replace it, as the Express is all I can afford right now. Here are the reasons why I am considering an Express:
- this will be a range and probably hunting gun, therefore I don't want to have to worry, obsess and have a heart attack fearing a scratch on an $850 shotgun.... I want USE it
- I am not someone who gives a crap about "pretty" guns, I am very utilitarian/minimalist (I am a Glock lover) so the mirror smooth finish on the receiver of a Wingmaster literally means nothing to me, and to be honest it actually turns me away since scratches will show up on it a lot easier
- the Express accepts and comes with Rem-Chokes
In short, my only concern is durability and reliability. Aside from the plastic trigger guard, is there ANY reason to believe that a Wingmaster would last longer, or be more reliable than an Express (after the Express has been nicely broken in that is)? Are there any parts in the Express that are made of a lower quality/strength material?
PS - Does the Express come with a Remington Super-Cell recoil pad? Also, does the Express handle only up to 3" shells, or does it do 3.5" as well? The Remington site sucks, it doesn't say.
Thanks!
Last edited: