Someone had mentioned that the "223 REM" stamp on the barrel may just be something S&W put on the rifle to get around State Department export restrictions and the chamber is actually 5.56.
am I the only one who thinks that spelling and grammar mistakes in a reply discredit the author? It's hard to take someone seriously when they can't handle the simple task of manipulating the english language.
Yes, considering the restriction on exportation of 5.56 by the US States department, if you can get your hands on some,you can use it, but I wouldn't use it exclusively the excessive pressure will cause premature wear and eventually failure.
I will have to say no on that.
The 5.56mm cartridge operates on higher chamber pressures that the .223 rem. A 5.56 will chamber in a .223 but its not safe. A 5.56 chamber has a longer throat to deal with the hinger pressures. A 5.56 case has a thicker base than the .223 to also help with the higher pressures.
Its not something I would do to my rifle after I spent a large chunk of change on it.
am I the only one who thinks that spelling and grammar mistakes in a reply discredit the author? It's hard to take someone seriously when they can't handle the simple task of manipulating the english language.
If the barrel is a real .223 (not a 5.56 hidden for export regulation) the answer is no...
Mainly for pressure difference.
http://www.saami.org/Unsafe_Combinations.cfm
Perhaps with a small manufacturer, this might be true - but I doubt Smith & Wesson is going to jeopardize thier US government contracts over thier tiny (comparative) export business.Someone had mentioned that the "223 REM" stamp on the barrel may just be something S&W put on the rifle to get around State Department export restrictions and the chamber is actually 5.56.




























