Restricted weapons

[dxtr]

Do all restricted weapons have to be fired at an approved range, or is it just handguns?

 

[FrankieT]

Legally, yes.

 

[Nine]

If you're talking about restricted firearms, then yes, they can only be fired at an approved range.

 

[waynesixgun]

Do all restricted firearms have to be fired at an approved range, or is it just handguns?

Fixed it for you

 

[bear.23]

That just happens to be one of the restrictions on those FIREARMS

 

[UCSPanther]

Yes. They can only be legally discharged at an approved range.

 

[dxtr]

Ok thanks guys!

 

[Onagoth]

I think its more a matter of the ATT. I don't believe the act says where you can and can't fire a restricted firearm, but good luck getting an ATT for anyplace other than an approved range.

 

[olegs69]

Our plight is already for naught as soon as we are forced to speak the doublespeak.

Firearms are weapons proper under the criminal code.
No point in sugar-coating it.

 

[smitty23]

I think its more a matter of the ATT. I don't believe the act says where you can and can't fire a restricted firearm, but good luck getting an ATT for anyplace other than an approved range.

yea you can't even get an ATT or any permission to bring a handgun as a sidearm when hunting. You have to convince the authorities that you're non-restricted wont be good enough to protect you. (Near impossible to argue), then argue that the handgun you bring cannot only be fired fast, but have the lethality to stop the animal. It's a losing cause.