Best. Holster. Ever.
- Thread starter Stevo
- Start date
I really hate Youtube videos where there is sound and they just press things and never say what the hell they are.
And holy you need three fingers to release the firearm. Might as well just put a trigger lock on it and then toss it in your trunk.
And holy you need three fingers to release the firearm. Might as well just put a trigger lock on it and then toss it in your trunk.
Pudelpointer
CGN frequent flyer
- Location
- Lethbridge, Alberta
Sooooooo..... what if push down on your holstered gun, but there is already a round chambered?
I guess you die while trying to clear the jam.
I guess you die while trying to clear the jam.
This is the most baffling part. It appears to be intended only to be carried with an empty chamber, but WHO carries a Glock without one in the tube? The whole idea of the DAO Glock safe action is keep it loaded and ready at all times it is in use. I guess if you are more concerned about a gun grabber, than you are about defending your life, this'd be the answer. As even if yabbo somehow (!) got your gun out of the holster, he'd probably not know there wasn't a round chambered.
What a puzzle the stupid thing is to open, as well. Just press the little lever, slide the paddle, and push a button, then push down to chamber a round, hold all levers and buttons while drawing back up. Suppose you short stroke it? Suppose you let go of one of the release levers while chambering a round? Suppose you push down with a round already chambered? What a nightmare. That's what happens when you let liberals design holsters.
ETA given that the holster would be harder to open than my safe, perhaps it would count as safe storage
Lol...where to begin!
I didn't see a timer, not sure how they came up with those times. Draw to fire? So, like after you release all these do-hickeys you might get it out in reasonable time. I'm gonna do some draws from my race holster and time "draw to fire"...should be able to hit a .10 the way he was doing it...and I might actually hit something. How about a reaction drill to see how long it takes to release all that crap! If you time from when his hands start moving from his chest I get between 1.65 and 2.0 seconds...add .2 to .3 for a reaction...well you wouldn't pass an IPSC course with that and those times are pretty liberal. (sarcasm)
Do piano lessons come with this holster? Or can you just automatically play one after dryfiring this thing for awhile?
Which part will fail first, the finger release, the thumb release, the index release or will you present the gun with holster still attached after the slidy part fails?
I gotta be honest, I know this thing was designed to meet some regulation or other in the "interest" of officer or civilian safety, and these guys did their best to meet that requirement with some interesting ideas, but if this is the result, wouldn't it just be easier to not arm them? If the police force or city, province or municipality are not interested enough to spend the time and money to make their force competent with guns and need this much assisatance to be "safe" I'd feel a whole lot safer if they just didn't have guns at all....
I didn't see a timer, not sure how they came up with those times. Draw to fire? So, like after you release all these do-hickeys you might get it out in reasonable time. I'm gonna do some draws from my race holster and time "draw to fire"...should be able to hit a .10 the way he was doing it...and I might actually hit something. How about a reaction drill to see how long it takes to release all that crap! If you time from when his hands start moving from his chest I get between 1.65 and 2.0 seconds...add .2 to .3 for a reaction...well you wouldn't pass an IPSC course with that and those times are pretty liberal. (sarcasm)
Do piano lessons come with this holster? Or can you just automatically play one after dryfiring this thing for awhile?
Which part will fail first, the finger release, the thumb release, the index release or will you present the gun with holster still attached after the slidy part fails?
I gotta be honest, I know this thing was designed to meet some regulation or other in the "interest" of officer or civilian safety, and these guys did their best to meet that requirement with some interesting ideas, but if this is the result, wouldn't it just be easier to not arm them? If the police force or city, province or municipality are not interested enough to spend the time and money to make their force competent with guns and need this much assisatance to be "safe" I'd feel a whole lot safer if they just didn't have guns at all....
Just what we need...a Canadian manufacturer building stupid Liberalized firearms junk. If their site was up I'd send them an email about how stupid this is.
If law enforcement can't carry with one in the tube safely, they're in the wrong business.
Maybe SLVE should just make one of these for Tazers?
If law enforcement can't carry with one in the tube safely, they're in the wrong business.
Maybe SLVE should just make one of these for Tazers?
Clobbersauras
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Waaay out west.
