Craftsman 441
CGN Regular
- Location
- Wainwright
Over the last few months I have been building building myself an SPR and it's nearly done. The recievers are new Stag Arms recievers from Arms East Inc. (thanks again Walter!) and fit very snug to each other.
So as I got to thinking about accurizing the AR, I started wondering about just how square the end of upper reciever is to the bore for the barrel extension. They true and square everything on bolt guns, right? I did some research and found that some shops do this very procedure for their builds. Armed with an idea, I bought a foot of dia. 1.25" stainless bar, designed a mandrel and stayed late in the machine shop for a couple of nights. Here's what came of it:
Mandrel done and mounted between centers.
I zeroed my dial indicator at the highest point and turned the chuck by hand until I found the lowest point. As you can see this reciever's front face is only 0.007" out of square with it's bore.
Since I was set up anyway, I wasn't going to let 0.007" go unchecked. I mean, that's not bad at all, but I was set to cut anyway.
When I was finished, the cut was nice and flat and square. After facing off the 0.007", the indicator didn't even move. The mandrel idea worked. Since I can't afford to build another SPR (everthing is a top grade part and quality optics are expensive), I sent the mandrel to Walter at AEI.
I know he is a very busy guy so it may take some time before he starts offering the service.
So as I got to thinking about accurizing the AR, I started wondering about just how square the end of upper reciever is to the bore for the barrel extension. They true and square everything on bolt guns, right? I did some research and found that some shops do this very procedure for their builds. Armed with an idea, I bought a foot of dia. 1.25" stainless bar, designed a mandrel and stayed late in the machine shop for a couple of nights. Here's what came of it:
Mandrel done and mounted between centers.
I zeroed my dial indicator at the highest point and turned the chuck by hand until I found the lowest point. As you can see this reciever's front face is only 0.007" out of square with it's bore.
Since I was set up anyway, I wasn't going to let 0.007" go unchecked. I mean, that's not bad at all, but I was set to cut anyway.
When I was finished, the cut was nice and flat and square. After facing off the 0.007", the indicator didn't even move. The mandrel idea worked. Since I can't afford to build another SPR (everthing is a top grade part and quality optics are expensive), I sent the mandrel to Walter at AEI.
I know he is a very busy guy so it may take some time before he starts offering the service.
Last edited:





























, but if you do some reading into AR precision builds (Accuracy Speaks comes to mind) especially with respect to the AMU work, trueing and blueprinting the barrel and receiver doesn't do diddly (according to a whole lot of folks that have tried and confirmed it).























