Canadian made glock carbine!

[Lazerus2000]

Nicely done!

I've got a similar Munimula Glockenstock project on the back burner, but I'm concentrating on my Munimula M14 stock first.

So how does it handle?
Balance?
Accuracy?

 

[Colin]

If he gets this to market, I may have to break down and buy a Glock. It would make an excellent gun for the wife.

 

[SCDL]

The VFG is rather low, isn't it?

 

[Armedsask]

Have you considered going to a one piece billet aluminum construction?

 

[Deckard]

Please call it a Glockenstein. I love it!

 

[Captain Paul]

Have you considered going to a one piece billet aluminum construction?

I think he said once the product is finalized he is planning on doing so.

 

[00Buck]

Folding stock would be good. Front grip looks too low? Add side rails?

Keep up the good work.

 

[tiriaq]

Even though you have put a lot of work into designing the cocking handle to be similar to an AR's in location and function, I would suggest that a better location would be on the front left. Immediately above the support hand position.
Here is another thought - I assume that the stock clamps to the receiver rail, and is then secured at a second point. IF the basic unit could be designed to work with other pistols using the frame rail, and a second point appropriate for different designs, the market potential would be greatly enhanced.

 

[Deckard]

100% agree. No AR handle, keep it up front.

 

[promac]

I own that first stock, and it's not very good. It helps but the build quality is not very sturdy. The length of pull on it is way to short, even in the fully extended position.

I have one as well and I'd have to agree with both points.

I like Armedsask's suggestion to make it of one piece billeted aluminum construction and the folding stock idea - lockable would be a plus as well - that when folded and locked, the pistol would be inoperable. Another idea I had was a model to incorporate/accomodate the 17L slide. With that, you'd have a tack-driver! I'd buy one.

 

[00Buck]

+1 on the charging handle location. Do it on the front left.

 

[omegaboost]

has to be a 45 acp with extended clip(30 rounds for the cool factor). folding stock, charging handle in front and a nice matte black finish.

 

[Camp Cook]

I'm interested but only for a G20/29 conversion and for me it needs a longer barrel.

 

[Colin]

Build the base model for the G17 and then expand it for the G22, G20. Careful Camp cook, carrying stuff like this might cause them to revoke your permit based on "lack of need" I know it's stupid, but you have to think stupid to prevent stupidity.

 

[Hadrian]

Interesting prototype, I couldn't imagine building such a thing.

 

[Camp Cook]

I don't have my Glocks on my ATC the CFC wouldn't let me have them on my last permit.

 

[Deckard]

+1 on the charging handle location. Do it on the front left.

Ambi!

 

[mrsmitty]

I don't have my Glocks on my ATC the CFC wouldn't let me have them on my last permit.

Do you have a glock 20? I wonder if they would let you carry that.

 

[Camp Cook]

Do you have a glock 20? I wonder if they would let you carry that.

I used to have my G20 on my ATC but 2 years ago they denied me the privilage of being able to carry it, I had bought a G29 a couple months before applying last time and they refused that one as well.

The CFC's reasoning was that semi-auto's weren't reliable so they were only allowing revolvers now.

 

[mrsmitty]

Are they nutz? Glocks are in alot of cases more reliable that most revolvers. And considering the firepower of 10 rounds of 10mm it is more than adequate for Wilderness protection.