NIB Benelli M4 with 14" Barrel....WOW CHECK IT OUT !!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Really Claybuster? That's the direction that you want to take this conversation/thread in? Everyone is a complete idiot except you? THe only way to not be a "complete idiot" is to enjoy shooting in the one narrowly defined way that you do? You really think that way?... :confused:
They way I think is that it doesn't make a lot of sense to spend more money on a gun that is restricted when the exact same gun with a slightly longer barrel is available for less money, less hassle and can be used more places.

As for the direction of this thread you took it there with your "Elmer" remark. Seems the tacticoooool guys feel free to throw around the cheap shots but become such delicate flowers when they get a little in return.

BTW, the $2,700 includes the taxes.
 
Last edited:
They way I think is that it's ridiculous to spend more money on a gun that is restricted when the exact same gun with a slightly longer barrel is available for less money, less hassle and can be used more places.


Why is this your concern? How someone spends their money is their business not yours. One could argue why you bust clays. To many, it could be seen to be a complete waste of time. Once you shoot those clays can you eat them?
 
Why is this your concern? How someone spends their money is their business not yours. One could argue why you bust clays. To many, it could be seen to be a complete waste of time. Once you shoot those clays can you eat them?

I shoot Clay's because Pumpkins are to hard to throw. :)
 
speaking of pumpkins, halloween is almost here!

:shotgun:
gunshot_pumpkin.gif



I shoot Clay's because Pumpkins are to hard to throw. :)


has anyone made a pumpkin launcher yet? :D
[youtube]k7F_Hfi62Zs[/youtube]
 
Why is this your concern? How someone spends their money is their business not yours. One could argue why you bust clays. To many, it could be seen to be a complete waste of time. Once you shoot those clays can you eat them?
I was responding to a question from another poster and the last time I checked this was a discussion board. I am participating in a discussion, offering an opinion. It is however a different opinion than those who fall all over themselves at the latest tactical toy.

The Benelli M4 is a great shotgun. Probably the best tactical shotgun on the market today. In the non-restricted form it is a practical gun with many uses, not so with the shorter barrel under our current laws

Although you do make a fair point about clays. While they are excellent practice for upland and waterfowl hunting they are inedible. The tactical pumpkin killers could make a pie.
 
They way I think is that it's ridiculous to spend more money on a gun that is restricted when the exact same gun with a slightly longer barrel is available for less money, less hassle and can be used more places.

As for the direction of this thread you took it there with your "Elmer" remark. Seems the tacticoooool guys feel free to throw around the cheap shots but become such delicate flowers when they get a little in return.

BTW, the $2,700 includes the taxes.

I made a tongue-in-cheek comment and didn't call anyone a "complete idiot" for not thinking the way I do... So your argument doesn't hold water. You don't have to agree with what others think, but neither do you need to call them idiots for having the opinions that they do.

As for the $2700 price including taxes... Well only a "complete idiot" would live somewhere where you would have to pay $300 in taxed on a $2400 purchase... :p See where I'm going with this... ;)
 
Claybuster:

My point is that something may be "ridiculous" to you, but may be perfect sense to someone else and vice versa.

Not to flog a dead horse and I know you don't think this way, but the arguement can be extended a lot further out. I.e. the hunters and "Fudds" #####ing about why someone needs to own and shoot handguns.

We should support everyone's right to piss money away! (Yes, I agree with you in principle; I see no point in buying a restricted M4, when you can get a non-restricted one, but hey, its their money.).
 
Claybuster:
I see no point in buying a restricted M4, when you can get a non-restricted one, but hey, its their money.).

Bingo.... A restricted M4 would be a impulse buy. When you actually find out there is not much you could use it for the EE will be full of them.
 
I made a tongue-in-cheek comment and didn't call anyone a "complete idiot" for not thinking the way I do... So your argument doesn't hold water. You don't have to agree with what others think, but neither do you need to call them idiots for having the opinions that they do.

As for the $2700 price including taxes... Well only a "complete idiot" would live somewhere where you would have to pay $300 in taxed on a $2400 purchase... :p See where I'm going with this... ;)
Ah, the tacticooooooool guys throw around the Fudds and Elmers but when they get a little back at them they claim it was only "tongue-in-cheek." Of course, how could we doubt you?

Okay, I'll meet you half way. In the spirit of good fellowship and as a reflection of my deep and abiding concern for your feelings I will edit my previous posts so as not to further offend you.
 
b-b-b-b-but......if I follow your line of thinking, that $10000.00 perazzi is an idiots purchase. I mean, it doesn't break birds any better than a cheap baikal.... and with skeet/skeet chokes it's really only very good at one thing......at the range.....because no one would take a 10,000.00 gun out in the duck blind........why would anyone spend 10K on a shotgun that only gets used at the range?
 
b-b-b-b-but......if I follow your line of thinking, that $10000.00 perazzi is an idiots purchase. I mean, it doesn't break birds any better than a cheap baikal.... and with skeet/skeet chokes it's really only very good at one thing......at the range.....because no one would take a 10,000.00 gun out in the duck blind........why would anyone spend 10K on a shotgun that only gets used at the range?

I wouldn't spend $10,000 on a Perazzi either ;) but it does serve a purpose. Set up properly it could be used for all Clay games. And in a pinch it could smash a Pumpkin too. And if you did want to take it into the field you could. As it would be Non Restricted.
 
^^^ Yes, but the POINT is that spending 10000 on a shotgun is something you do because you WANT it, NOT because you need it.....and that's what it's all about. If someone buys that M4 because they WANT it, it makes them no more of an idiot than someone who pays 10K for an O/U.

Frig, if that mentality spreads everyone who doesn't shoot a 299.00 stevens 200 will be an "idiot".

The amount of judgement thrown around by a certain group of shooters is sickening.

Wannna know the difference between a "fudd" and the "Tacticool guys"?

Fudd: "You are an idiot for owning that"
Tacticool Guys: "You can own your levers, that's cool...they are just not my bag"

The whole "superiority complex" displayed by that group is what is tearing the shooting sports apart. Grow the #### up.
 
The whole "superiority complex" displayed by that group is what is tearing the shooting sports apart. Grow the f**k up.

It has nothing to do with a "superiority complex" It has to do with versatility. A restricted Shotgun has very little. When you could purchase the same gun with a longer barrel for less money. And use it for just about everything.
 
It has nothing to do with a "superiority complex" It has to do with versatility. A restricted Shotgun has very little. When you could purchase the same gun with a longer barrel for less money. And use it for just about everything.


To YOU. It has very little versatility to YOU. An O/U has very little versatility to ME, but I would never call you an idiot for buying one if that's what you wanted. THAT's the superiority complex I'm talking about.....if it doesn't suit YOU, it is useless.


I don't care what other poeople own... Full autos, dewatts, fancy schmancy shotguns, pistols, bolts, levers, or blackpowder....and I don't care if they use them to hunt, shoot targets, or just fondle them in their gun room......I'm just happy they have what they want. You guys, on the other hand, are just self important enough that you feel you can pass judgement on others for their own personal choices.
 
To YOU. It has very little versatility to YOU. An O/U has very little versatility to ME, but I would never call you an idiot for buying one if that's what you wanted. THAT's the superiority complex I'm talking about.....if it doesn't suit YOU, it is useless.


I don't care what other poeople own... Full autos, dewatts, fancy schmancy shotguns, pistols, bolts, levers, or blackpowder....and I don't care if they use them to hunt, shoot targets, or just fondle them in their gun room......I'm just happy they have what they want. You guys, on the other hand, are just self important enough that you feel you can pass judgement on others for their own personal choices.

No one is passing any "judgement" on anyone personally. The opinions were on a gun... Not on the people that buy them. For voicing a negative opinion I get called a "FUDD". If you don't like varying opinions this would be a very dull website.
 
It has nothing to do with a "superiority complex" It has to do with versatility. A restricted Shotgun has very little. When you could purchase the same gun with a longer barrel for less money. And use it for just about everything.

Do you get more mag capacity with the Non-Res M4?..... Nope. So whats the point for someone that only shoots at the range....

wait a tick.......


You do realize that there are people in the world that are different than you and actually have the intention of using their firearms only at the range.... I mean come on, quit being so ignorant. Each to his own as they say, quit being such a buzz kill.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom