I ran into a CO this evening in Tims, and the first thing I noticed was the soft armor vest, and then the handgun.
What's the rationale behind this!?
The only possible (legitimate) use I can see for the sidearm is to make away with a moose or something struck on the side of the road.. But a 12ga or .30-30 in the truck would seem to be a much better tool for this task..
I don't think that soft vest is going to stop a .308 or .30-06 round, and if that handgun is for defense against crazed hunters, I should be allowed to carry one too!
What's up with this? I haven't met many wildlife officers in the woods, but I've NEVER met one that was armed as such.
What's the rationale behind this!?
The only possible (legitimate) use I can see for the sidearm is to make away with a moose or something struck on the side of the road.. But a 12ga or .30-30 in the truck would seem to be a much better tool for this task..
I don't think that soft vest is going to stop a .308 or .30-06 round, and if that handgun is for defense against crazed hunters, I should be allowed to carry one too!
What's up with this? I haven't met many wildlife officers in the woods, but I've NEVER met one that was armed as such.


















































