########?

They are cheap and easy to manufacture. Most of the parts are salvaged from scrapped Stens, only the tube and the stripped magazine housing are newly made.

The only part on mine that was from a scrapped sten was the trigger housing and cover, everything else was new.

They do look cheap though.;)

IMG_1586.jpg


IMG_1588.jpg


IMG_1593.jpg


IMG_1597.jpg
 
When the earlier versions were eventually submitted for inspection, they were ruled to be prohibited, not as CA, but as machineguns, based on the ease with which they could fire bursts. These were the guns being fired in the builder's backyard. Which, apparently, is OK in Saskatchewan.
A revised version has been accepted as restricted.

lol
 
The only part on mine that was from a scrapped sten was the trigger housing and cover, everything else was new.

They do look cheap though.;)

IMG_1586.jpg


IMG_1588.jpg


IMG_1593.jpg


IMG_1597.jpg

Now, czech, you know that simply isn't true. There are a LOT more original Sten parts there than just the trigger housing and cover. Incidentally which of the ones that you show was yours? Those are all newer ones.
 
Are those pop rivets holding the barrel trunnion and handguard on the mk3 version? Also on the front sight guard of the mk1 mockup??

With a salesman like czechitout on his team, being banned from CGN (and now milsurp's forum too) really doesn't slow old spencer down.
 
I think those are roundhead Allen screws. Definite improvement. Drill out the hex recess, and the screw is not readily removed. As anyone who has stripped out the screws in a scope mount can testify.
 
I could be wrong but I dont think they are rivets as the barrels are removable.

I have a MK1 on order that I will be collecting it at the Brandon show next month. ( another plug for discount leverage : )
 
A I or a I*?
Do you think it will be registered and transferable in time?
You decided not to wait for a non-restricted gun?
Wouldn't it be a shorter drive to pick it up in SK, rather than go all the way to MB?
You could even test fire it in his backyard.;)
 
A MKI* like in the picture above. It will be a non restricted one, but I will also be getting a standard length barrel with it. That's how I know the barrels are removable. I'm sure it will be built, registered and transferable by next month. They are all approved by the CFC. It's a shorter drive to Brandon as I will be in Winnipeg that weekend, and being non restricted I can test fire it on the way home.

I was at Micks place a few weeks back when he was test firing one of the stens but he just could not get it to work properly, we must have used up at least 500 rounds before he fixed it. :D
 
Now, czech, you know that simply isn't true. There are a LOT more original Sten parts there than just the trigger housing and cover. Incidentally which of the ones that you show was yours? Those are all newer ones.

Mine was a MK2, the same as the second pic from the top. Everything but the trigger housing and cover was new. I don't know if the parts were original sten parts or not but I know they were all new.
 
Mine was a MK2, the same as the second pic from the top. Everything but the trigger housing and cover was new. I don't know if the parts were original sten parts or not but I know they were all new.

That's right. Most of the parts are salvaged from scrapped guns. Maybe some of the scrapped guns were unissued. A lot of the ones scrapped here in Canada were unissued.
 
A MKI* like in the picture above. It will be a non restricted one, but I will also be getting a standard length barrel with it. That's how I know the barrels are removable. I'm sure it will be built, registered and transferable by next month. They are all approved by the CFC. It's a shorter drive to Brandon as I will be in Winnipeg that weekend, and being non restricted I can test fire it on the way home.

I was at Micks place a few weeks back when he was test firing one of the stens but he just could not get it to work properly, we must have used up at least 500 rounds before he fixed it. :D


Having an approved design isn't quite the same as actually having the registration certificate actually in hand.

How are you going to deal with a non-restricted long barrelled gun and an original length barrel that would put the gun into the restricted category if installed? Play silly buggers with the RCMP, getting it verified and reporting a change in classification every time you swap barrels?
Here is a suggestion. Go with a Mk. II or V. One complete gun. One additional magazine housing and barrel. One magazine housing is registered as restricted, the other as non-restricted. Have your cake and eat it too, avoids the problem of ever having a non-restricted firearm with a way-to-short barrel on it.
 
Having an approved design isn't quite the same as actually having the registration certificate actually in hand.
How are you going to deal with a non-restricted gun and an original length barrel that would put the gun into the restricted category if installed? Play silly buggers with the RCMP, reporting a change in classification every time you swap barrels?

I want a standard length barrel so I can change the classification at a later date if I feel like it. I also think the gun will be a better investment if I have both barrels.
 
Yes. The mag. housing is a Mk. II.
In Laidler, that gun is referred to as the Mk4A. There is also a Mk4A(S), with a suppressor.
There is also a Mk4B, a MkIV (T42) and a MkIIII, all different. The T42 is interesting.
 
Yes. The mag. housing is a Mk. II.
In Laidler, that gun is referred to as the Mk4A. There is also a Mk4A(S), with a suppressor.
There is also a Mk4B, a MkIV (T42) and a MkIIII, all different. The T42 is interesting.

Got pics?
 
I just saw a video on the Yorkton gun show and this guy was on there.

://smginternational.net/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top Bottom