- Location
- calgary alberta
I don't understand. I thought we were talking abou the physical shape of the base and not materials.
Is 17-4 and a tap ($5) make $150 more in price then 6061? what is the scope made of? 6061 or 17-4?
I understood the big selling feature of the base you are selling is its physical shape for side impact and not the material.
Is 6061 not suitable for mounts? How much stronger is your base? Would it be 150% stronger like the price?
It would help to have pictures of the base underside like Near Mfg or of the undersides showing the locking feature. Do you have a photo of one installed on a TRG? It would be great to see them on the site. Lots of confusion.
Why not supply the metric screws? Seems running a tap into an expensive rifle might not be a good idea for the average guy with no cutting lubes or way to clean the action one the tap was used.
17-4 stainless steel is ALOT more expensive material than 6061 aluminum is. About 3 times more in fact and it is ALOT harder to machine so tooling last less and takes ALOT more machine time than machining aluminum does, about double the time.
Some specs to ponder.
17-4 condition H1150 tensile strength 144000 PSI brinnell hardness 311
6061 T461 tensile strength 45000 PSI brinnell hardness 95
1018 (common mild steel) tensile strength 63800 PSI brinnell hardness 126
Guess which 1 will distort from torque or crush easiest??
So in answer to your question I guess it is yes, our rail IS 3 times stronger and costs alot more to make, so is priced accordingly.
We are trying to source the metric screws so as to avoid the issue of guys with little mechanical adeptness having to chase threads on their rifle.