Given the same barrel lenght, the 300WSM is ALWAYS going to have more velocity than the 308 die to greater case capacity.
It is amazing to me how this fact, applied generally, is lost on so many.
my friend bought a 300wsm BLR last year and shot a moose at 75 yards or so with it while hunting from his truck. well the 300 wsm, because of the higher velocity, went straight through the moose, and he had to shoot it once again but the moose still didn't go down. it ran off into the bush so then he waited an hour or so to make sure the moose was dead before going in after it. it turns out he shot it through both lungs but because of the velocity of the bullet, it didn't cause as much damage as he'd hoped for. he's since sold the wsm and bought a BLR in 308 which is what i would have done in the first place. if you're shooting say 500 yards though.....i think the wsm is probly the way to go.
my friend bought a 300wsm BLR last year and shot a moose at 75 yards or so with it while hunting from his truck. well the 300 wsm, because of the higher velocity, went straight through the moose, and he had to shoot it once again but the moose still didn't go down. it ran off into the bush so then he waited an hour or so to make sure the moose was dead before going in after it. it turns out he shot it through both lungs but because of the velocity of the bullet, it didn't cause as much damage as he'd hoped for. he's since sold the wsm and bought a BLR in 308 which is what i would have done in the first place. if you're shooting say 500 yards though.....i think the wsm is probly the way to go.
my friend bought a 300wsm BLR last year and shot a moose at 75 yards or so with it while hunting from his truck. well the 300 wsm, because of the higher velocity, went straight through the moose, and he had to shoot it once again but the moose still didn't go down. it ran off into the bush so then he waited an hour or so to make sure the moose was dead before going in after it. it turns out he shot it through both lungs but because of the velocity of the bullet, it didn't cause as much damage as he'd hoped for. he's since sold the wsm and bought a BLR in 308 which is what i would have done in the first place. if you're shooting say 500 yards though.....i think the wsm is probly the way to go.
I've got one buddy who bought one of those 16" bbl'd Rugers in 300WSM, louder than all gitty up for sure, we put some handloads thru it over the chrony, 180's were spot on 2700FPS.
my friend bought a 300wsm BLR last year and shot a moose at 75 yards or so with it while hunting from his truck. well the 300 wsm, because of the higher velocity, went straight through the moose, and he had to shoot it once again but the moose still didn't go down. it ran off into the bush so then he waited an hour or so to make sure the moose was dead before going in after it. it turns out he shot it through both lungs but because of the velocity of the bullet, it didn't cause as much damage as he'd hoped for. he's since sold the wsm and bought a BLR in 308 which is what i would have done in the first place. if you're shooting say 500 yards though.....i think the wsm is probly the way to go.
I've got one buddy who bought one of those 16" bbl'd Rugers in 300WSM, louder than all gitty up for sure, we put some handloads thru it over the chrony, 180's were spot on 2700FPS.
So 4" more bbl, hmm I'd wager you be in the stoked up 30'06 to 300H&H relm.
It is amazing to me how this fact, applied generally, is lost on so many.
Not lost on me.
I was always under the impression that with two cartridges of the same bore size, and different powder capacity, the smaller case was more effecient in burning all it's powder, whereas the larger case spit more unused propulsion energy out behind the bullet as muzzle flash.
?
With 20" barrels?
i am a big fan of the Ruger Compacts, but IMO getting a magnum with a 16.5" barrel is retarded.



























