Sig 226 and the Glock 17. Whats the difference?

$1100 for a P226 seems kind of cheap, the prices I have seen on them are about $1250 everywhere that has had one in stock. Personally I like the SIG, I have fired both and I thought the sig was a better shot. I own a Beretta M9A1 and I just got back from the range, shoots like a dream, takes any ammo and never jams. Its more expensive than the Glock but less than the Sig by a few hundred bucks, an excellent gun.
 
I have no confidence shooting a glock, jumps like a jack rabbit...very confident shooting a p226.... smooth.... for me $500 savings is no consideration when it comes to safety.
 
Glock vs. Sig
Ak vs. AR
Ford vs. Bmw
Timex vs. Rolex
They all do what they were designed to do well, the latter just does is it 'tighter' then the former.
That being said I wear a Rolex but I love to shoot the timex.
 
I have no confidence shooting a glock, jumps like a jack rabbit...very confident shooting a p226.... smooth.... for me $500 savings is no consideration when it comes to safety.

I on the other hand found Sig didn't shoot worth a dime for me, not even come close to my 75B that I sold while back:D. My $599 Glock 17 shoot even better than the 226 that I've tried.

Trigun
 
I own neither gun but buying something made out of injection molded plastic over machined metal would be a lot cheaper. Better quality? I don't know. I've never shot a Glock. I have shot the S&W M&P and thought it was OK. Then again I have numerous guns with alloy frames and steel slides. I'm not what you would consider a small guy and if I had my way and could afford it, I'd have all my handguns made out of solid steel. But then again I have Norcs mixed in with my S&W's, CZ's and Walthers.
 
I have no confidence shooting a glock, jumps like a jack rabbit...very confident shooting a p226.... smooth.... for me $500 savings is no consideration when it comes to safety. Dizzy

Ok I'll bite. Please explain the safety portion of your post.

TDC

Due to much better handling of the Sig for me its significantly safer it simply doesn't require near the grip strength a glock does to shoot furthermore my hands sweat a lot and the glock grip is really aweful for any thing less than dry hands
 
I've had my P226 for about a year....I love it. I like the looks, the weight, minimal recoil and it is extremely accurate. I say "accurate" b/c I would still consider myself to be a novice shooter, yet I'm shooting tight patterns.
 
Due to much better handling of the Sig for me its significantly safer it simply doesn't require near the grip strength a glock does to shoot furthermore my hands sweat a lot and the glock grip is really aweful for any thing less than dry hands

I'm still unclear as to how "better handling" equates to a safer pistol? The slippery grip on Glocks is definitely a reality. Grip tape solves the problem. As far as grip strength, I'm still confused. Unless you run a G20/21 there is no additional strength required to manage recoil. The low bore axis makes recoil management less of a struggle than that of other handguns.

TDC
 
Found a funny quote
GLOCK lovers and haters - not much in between. People who don't like them usually blame something vague like "grip angle" or "terrible trigger" (though most couldn't shoot much better with a gun custom molded to their hand with a trigger pull that snaps like a saltine cracker).

One is metal, One is polymer
People who say it feels like a toy...Either had some insane toys as youngsters or they are sounding tough talking fluff.

Who buys a synthetic rifle and complains it doesn't feel like walnut?
What do you expect a synthetic frame would feel like... steel?
Or in the case of most metal guns aluminum.

Also you might consider with the money they save on polymer you are getting double in the steel, over the excess cost of manufacturing the metal frame. Maybe that is where the extra cost comes from and lands you about equal in value.
 
"....Also you might consider with the money they save on polymer you are getting double in the steel, over the excess cost of manufacturing the metal frame. Maybe that is where the extra cost comes from and lands you about equal in value. ..."


"EQUAL IN VALUE"...huh?

nobody stops you buying what you want or like...keep on buy cheap plastics, IMHO you can have all of them, but for sure a plastic will be never in my wish list...LOL !
 
Just take a look at youtube on how to strip them down fully and get them back together.
Takes 10 min to get the glock fully disassembled and assembled back, you will spend an good 40 min to do the same with a SIG (may take a way longer if you will have to get under the table to find the SIG self propelling small springs and parts, o yeah, and you have to get a new roll pin from sigarms each time you decide to take your firing pin out for cleaning, or so do SIGARMS recommends)
Glock parts are super easy to find in Canada and US, they are on ebay and bunch of online stores will ship them here and they costs cents
Try to find something for Sig.. GOOD LUCK.
If someone tells that Sig has good trigger...don't believe it, but try it yourself.
Yes, Sig does feet hand better, but if here is a war tomorrow I will take my Glock with me.
Glock finish way wear and scratch resistant then SIG. Sig is more accurate then Glock and you can shoot lead in SIG with no problem but in Glock you will have to scab barrel out to get the lead out.
If I have to make a choice I would go with a Glock. Glock is a tool, Sig is something to impress the friends with and have fun with it on the range.


I don't know where you get 40 minutes to tear down a sig... I can have all the springs and components out of my p226 in five minutes or less. I've never actually timed myself but the P226 is not difficult to disassemble/reassemble... unless you were the kid who tried to put the square block through the circle hole with a big hammer.

My sig is getting pretty nice holster rash on the end of the slide and where the thumb break contacts the left side of the slide.

Accuracy? With the right ammo I can make hit after hit on the gong at 100m.

The glock doesn't feel right in my hands compared to the sig, plus they are, in my opinion, one of the ugliest handguns on the market. Besides you could always buy a used sig for $600-$800 to save money instead of buying new...
 
Back
Top Bottom