223 or 204 Ruger

204 will not burn barrels, it does not foul any worse than a 17hmr, it is not hard to find brass (anymore), 'too much drift' arguments always forget 'time of flight', anything that people have to say 'bad' about 204 is either grossly misinformed or.... well wrong.
Don't shoot elephants with it. Its a 32/40grain pellet... use it on small stuff. It's not a wolf gun IMO. If you want to blast squirrels or crows at five hundred yards.... get one. I love watching the blood, feathers, and fur fly. My 223's are no where near as much fun.
32grn Hornady v-maxs.... awesome accuracy.
I run a stainless heavy bbl No1. Haven't touched it from stock and I'd put it up against any custom varmint jobby out there. I give Hornady half the credit there.
.204 is kinda like 10mm. Those who have put it to the test... know.
 
canuckgunny said:
204 will not burn barrels, it does not foul any worse than a 17hmr, it is not hard to find brass (anymore), 'too much drift' arguments always forget 'time of flight', anything that people have to say 'bad' about 204 is either grossly misinformed or.... well wrong. Don't shoot elephants with it. Its a 32/40grain pellet... use it on small stuff. It's not a wolf gun IMO. If you want to blast squirrels or crows at five hundred yards.... get one. I love watching the blood, feathers, and fur fly. My 223's are no where near as much fun. 32grn Hornady v-maxs.... awesome accuracy. I run a stainless heavy bbl No1. Haven't touched it from stock and I'd put it up against any custom varmint jobby out there. I give Hornady half the credit there. .204 is kinda like 10mm. Those who have put it to the test... know.
Click to expand...

Great post.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom