Whats a good rangefinder for up to 1000m

F

fuzzynuts54

BANNED
BANNED
BANNED
EE Expired
Rating - 100%
1   0   0
I have a piece of junk that good for 500m reflective surface, the target area is so vaugue you dont know if its the target or the back stop and on soft targets who knows maby 200 - 250. I dont want to repeat this with the next rangefinder. Looking for high magnification, pinpoint cross hairs that are on target and not $10 000. How about the good old adjust until object is in focus and bam theres your range kind?
 
Nikon. Faster processor means you don't have to hold it still as long. My 1200 is more than good to 1000 if you can hold it still. On a bipod it does that easy. Their experience in cameras shows through here. Just like with cameras, faster processors make for easier overall use, as there is less time for "shake" to affect your picture or ranging attempt. And therefore Nikon makes the fastest processor of all the brands.
 
I dont have it with me, I cant remember what model is is, I think its bushnell and a few years old.. Im just getting into the longer range shooting and for example one place I shoot across a gulley, its a hill on the other side and I place my targets on stumps, or sometimes I just shoot for rocks or knots, I have to range it few times to be sure what if Im getting the hill or the stump, the cross hairs are not accurate. Soon as I get something better, this thing might be placed on a stump as well. Drives me nuts. gow about range finding scopes into the 14+ power?
 
I just love the Leica 15x56 Geovid HD Laser Rangefinder Binocular

These things are absolutely awsome

Here's how I figure it...

You got a GREAT pair of binoculars so you dont need to carry those separately

15 power - if you need the rangefinder in the first place then you need plenty of magnification to see it, so dont bother with less

High cost?
Well if you buy the bushnell and are not happy with it, then you waisted the money. I also have a bushnell rated for 800 yards and that's straight up BS. It's tough to get a good bead at 500 with it unless its a bill board.

The Leica on the other hand works as advertized and then some.

The cost stings a bit at first, but you will never regret owning them...
never
 
CreamySmooth said:
Nikon. Faster processor means you don't have to hold it still as long. My 1200 is more than good to 1000 if you can hold it still. On a bipod it does that easy. Their experience in cameras shows through here. Just like with cameras, faster processors make for easier overall use, as there is less time for "shake" to affect your picture or ranging attempt. And therefore Nikon makes the fastest processor of all the brands.
Click to expand...

Dude

You cant be suggesting that Nikon is anywhere near the same class as Leica

Please dont go there
 
Are you talking about a scope with a MIL reticle or a scope with a built in LRF (Laser Range Finder)? If you plan on using the reticle you need to know the dimensions of your target plus do a quick calculation. You can get a close range estimation with known targets.

I personally would opt for a hand held LRF over one built into a scope. The one in the scope is good only for that gun. A hand held is good for what ever your heart desires. I would recommend a Leica or Swarovski. They will range past 1000 yards 98% of the time. I only picked these two because I have one and some friends have the other and they both work great. The Nikon and Zeiss are supposed to work great as well.
 
and prices for the lecia 1200 and geo vid? I need a new scope some time also, and I only have one long range rifle so if there is a decent laser range finder scope that is an option. Hand held or scope, doent matter al long as it works and high magnification like the Geo vid or better.
 
I personally would opt for a hand held LRF over one built into a scope.
Click to expand...

And I prefer the binoculars with built in rangefinder,like my Geovid HDs.As I look over an animal with my binoculars,I range it at the same time,and I have one less piece of equipment to carry in the field.
 
GunBoy said:
Leica 1200 would be very effective to 1000.
Click to expand...

And with the new 1600 yard Leica model coming on the market in August the EE might have a deal or two avalible;)

I have a 1200 Leica and it was a huge step up from the Bushnell I had prior (900 yard model:rolleyes: ) A very good Range finder!:D
 
JasonS said:
Price doesn't always mean better in a lot of things. Just saying.
Click to expand...

and cheap is not always cheap

Often times when you dont pay enough, the item is not satifactory and then you just waisted the money, which you must add later to the cost of the good one you will inevitably buy later, which would have been cheaper if you had just bought the good one in the first place.
 
The Nikon 1200s is a great unit that can hit soft targets at that range. We do have a very quick processor as previously posted and I'd recommend head to your local shop and ask to pop your head out the front door and compare it against something else you like. I'd proudly say you will be impressed.

We do have a new model coming out in late August that will be a 1000yd model with an auto-switching reticle that will go from LCD black to LED red on its own depending on the target you sight.

Do your best to handle the product before you buy it though, no matter which brand you choose. But I'd endorse the Nikon of course. :)
 
leica is coming out this summer/fall with a new crf model in a 1600 yard rangefinder.it is supposed to have a ballistic drop compensator in it too.
 
oy yoy yoy. My bunger hurts and I have'nt even posted my ad on craigslist yet.... hey fella you need a date? Im guessing thats the best buck for the bang. well Im not wasting money on any bushnell junk so Ill attempt to save the scratch. Whats the magnification on the Nikons? Trying to target a 10'' object at 643 meters with a 4power aint gonna happen.
 
fclassguy said:
and cheap is not always cheap

Often times when you dont pay enough, the item is not satifactory and then you just waisted the money, which you must add later to the cost of the good one you will inevitably buy later, which would have been cheaper if you had just bought the good one in the first place.
Click to expand...

True. But if the quality names in optics these days are grouped pretty close in price range that means something. Some have been making excellent cameras used by the worlds best photographers. Sure an el'cheapo rangefinder for $150 is a total waste of money. But spending $400-600 gets some dependable gear. Have you seen the riflescope prices for Leica?

L - lot'sa
E - extra
I - in-
C - come
A - available

should be their motto!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom