Dlask Reciever with or with out rail

[Bush Hunter]

If you were to buy a dlask reciever would it be with or without the built-in rail. For those of you that have one which did you buy and why. This going onto a Boyds tacticool stock with a dlask 16" fluted barrel.

Thanks James

 

[kombayotch]

Depends what you want to do with the rifle...

I put 20-25 MOA rails on all my .22s so that they can be shot at long range, so I would go without.

 

[sl66ICEcuba]

I would personally buy it with the rail just so that my options are not limited.

 

[Bush Hunter]

I'm probably only going to shoot it up to 100 yards and maybe up to 200 yards.

 

[matty86suk]

i have a railed dlask receiver, my scope runs out of elevation at 140 yards, i would like at least to be able to zero for 200 yards, or even 250 yards, does dlask offer a 20/30 moa base for their flat top receiver??

 

[shimmer]

I was think of doing a similar build - where did you get your stock from?

 

[Bush Hunter]

Stock

I bought my stock from rimfire sports and custom. Delivery was $10 and customs charged me $20. It was more expensive than direct from Boyd's but Boyd's have stopped building them. It's a pretty sweet stock. I can see that I will have to bed it though.

James

 

[homer76]

i have a railed dlask receiver, my scope runs out of elevation at 140 yards, i would like at least to be able to zero for 200 yards, or even 250 yards, does dlask offer a 20/30 moa base for their flat top receiver??

My current solution has been to cut up a pop can and shim the rings with the pieces of pop can. I have a Bushnell 3-9x rimfire scope and with it zeroed at 25 yards I still have enough elevation in the scope to shoot out to 300 yards.

If you want a more expensive solution than a cut up pop can Burris makes a pretty decent set of rings (Burris Zee Rings) with inserts up to 20 moa.