- Location
- Somewhere on the Hudson Bay Coast
There is much overlap in the terminal performance of many modern rifle cartridges, thus many cartridges are suitable for doing many of the same things. The suggestion that one does something remarkably better than another is in most instances dishonest if the speaker is knowledgeable on the subject. When the new shooter is attempting to select his cartridge, the choices can be a little overwhelming, so answering some basic questions will hopefully simplify his problem.
1) What is it for?
As in what size of game? The cartridge should be chosen with the hopes of meeting the criteria of having a reasonable expectation of making a one shot kill, from any angle, within the range limitations of the rifle, cartridge, and marksman. This might be a .250 Savage if the game is a deer or it might be a .500 Nitro for an elephant. Without some experience however, the new hunter must rely on anecdotal evidence presented by others. Under most circumstances, if the smallest and the largest recommendations are discounted, you will probably be close to making a good choice.
2) How far away?
There is little need in choosing a cartridge which drives a bullet at 3500 fps for bush hunting when your absolute maximum range is 75 yards. Conversely, a .32-20 or a .45/70 might not be the top choices for speed goats in Southeastern Alberta. Under most hunting conditions, ranges rarely exceed 300 yards, and any rifle with a muzzle velocity of 2500 fps can provide a flat trajectory that far out.
3) Will it fit in a conveniently sized rifle?
If you have your heart set on a traditional lever action carbine, a cartridge based on the .378 Weatherby is not for you.
4) Can I manage it?
There is an attraction to powerful rifles for some people, I was/am one of them. Heavy recoil is however an acquired taste and if you have to ask the question, you probably don't have the experience to manage a cartridge with more punch than a .30/06. More than a few find a .30/06 in a light sporter, firing factory ammo, too objectionable for them to ever become proficient marksmen with and end up believing that rifle shooting is just beyond their abilities. That is unfortunate because with a well mannered 6.5X55 or a 7X57 they could end up becoming deadly field shots on any North American game.
5) Is it affordable?
Of course not, but buy it anyway. I have come to the conclusion that the cost of a rifle is almost irrelevant. The true cost of shooting comes from the ammo you must feed the beast. I found that regularly shooting a .416 Rigby was intimidating, not from recoil, but from dropping a $5 bill every time I pressed the trigger. The scariest words in the world were, "Hey, nice rifle . . . can I try it?" That was 10-12 years ago, what it would cost today to buy 100 Norma .416 Rigby cases, stuff them with over 100 grs of 4350, and top them off with premium bullets, then shoot it often enough to keep proficient, I don't know.
1) What is it for?
As in what size of game? The cartridge should be chosen with the hopes of meeting the criteria of having a reasonable expectation of making a one shot kill, from any angle, within the range limitations of the rifle, cartridge, and marksman. This might be a .250 Savage if the game is a deer or it might be a .500 Nitro for an elephant. Without some experience however, the new hunter must rely on anecdotal evidence presented by others. Under most circumstances, if the smallest and the largest recommendations are discounted, you will probably be close to making a good choice.
2) How far away?
There is little need in choosing a cartridge which drives a bullet at 3500 fps for bush hunting when your absolute maximum range is 75 yards. Conversely, a .32-20 or a .45/70 might not be the top choices for speed goats in Southeastern Alberta. Under most hunting conditions, ranges rarely exceed 300 yards, and any rifle with a muzzle velocity of 2500 fps can provide a flat trajectory that far out.
3) Will it fit in a conveniently sized rifle?
If you have your heart set on a traditional lever action carbine, a cartridge based on the .378 Weatherby is not for you.
4) Can I manage it?
There is an attraction to powerful rifles for some people, I was/am one of them. Heavy recoil is however an acquired taste and if you have to ask the question, you probably don't have the experience to manage a cartridge with more punch than a .30/06. More than a few find a .30/06 in a light sporter, firing factory ammo, too objectionable for them to ever become proficient marksmen with and end up believing that rifle shooting is just beyond their abilities. That is unfortunate because with a well mannered 6.5X55 or a 7X57 they could end up becoming deadly field shots on any North American game.
5) Is it affordable?
Of course not, but buy it anyway. I have come to the conclusion that the cost of a rifle is almost irrelevant. The true cost of shooting comes from the ammo you must feed the beast. I found that regularly shooting a .416 Rigby was intimidating, not from recoil, but from dropping a $5 bill every time I pressed the trigger. The scariest words in the world were, "Hey, nice rifle . . . can I try it?" That was 10-12 years ago, what it would cost today to buy 100 Norma .416 Rigby cases, stuff them with over 100 grs of 4350, and top them off with premium bullets, then shoot it often enough to keep proficient, I don't know.
Last edited:



















































