Best glock sights?

Yeah I found myself having to correct my point of aim a lot. Adjustables would have made the world of difference. Operator error being a strong possibility, I had my range officer test the pistol and it shot high and to the right. I could hit the 10 aiming at about 1 oclock, but at 6 I hadnt a chance. He suggested novak adjustable sights, but I moved on and sold my Glock. Regretfully.
 
Adam F85 said:
Yeah I found myself having to correct my point of aim a lot. Adjustables would have made the world of difference. Operator error being a strong possibility, I had my range officer test the pistol and it shot high and to the right. I could hit the 10 aiming at about 1 oclock, but at 6 I hadnt a chance. He suggested novak adjustable sights, but I moved on and sold my Glock. Regretfully.
Click to expand...



lololol...imagine having only stock sights on many guns owned, not one requiring the same POA for the right POI.
 
wicked_police said:
That's great, and I'll never say you shouldn't be able to buy and own what you want. That's not the point I'm trying to make at all. When I say a waste, I mean the extra money spent could go towards more ammo, a good holster, proper shooting glasses, things that will give you a measurable improvement on your shooting or scores or times, etc.
Unless of course, shooting well doesn't mean much to you, and it's more about looks and having cool stuff hanging on your gun. Then go all out and buy tritium sights that you'll most likely never use except when you admire them going into the dark safe or cabinet when you put your guns away.

But, just so the OP knows, the Glock night sights have a much better warranty on the tritium than trijicon does, and for less money, they glow just and bright.


Some would say owning a $7500 SR-25 is a waste as well, but Questar has no problem selling the few he's been able to bring in.


ps: while trijicons may be great 'fighting' sights suitable for a working gun, there are better options out there for target or action shooting such as IPSC and IDPA.
Click to expand...

Smart man... Sounds like someone who knows his stuff and has training to back it up...
 
Yah. me too.

I think it was about 2.5-3 feet of holdover at 100m, but my 5946 was putting them all into about a 2 foot diameter "beaten zone" at that range... I'm sure the pistol would have done better out of a machine, but it was kind of neat to see that you could annoy someone effectively at the end of a football field, with a pistol.

Who needs a patrol carbine, I mean, really?
 
you don't need to holdover for long range. Front sight lines up where you want it to hit and you adjust the height with the rear sight.

This shooter is unreal. Glock 23 at 230 yards on a steel gong

h ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zFd3kF6LHz4&feature=related
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom