I like the Hogue stocks because they seem quite stiff and thus capable of supporting the barrel. On both my Hogue-stocked 10/22s (one 20" HB, one 18.5" sporter) I placed a 1/8" thick piece of sticky-backed foam at the raised end of the barrel channel to support the barrel. I got the sticky foam with my gun cabinet; it's enough to do a hundred stocks.
jjohnwm, your post made me curious, so I measured my HB 10/22, and there is 9" of barrel sticking out past the end of the stock. That means a 12" barrel would stick 1" out past the end of the stock? Anyway, you could try some sticky foam at the end of the barrel channel and see how it shoots with that. Hopefully barrel drop with a 12" barrel isn't an issue either way.
Yes, the barrel barely projects beyond the end of the Hogue stock. Looks different, but handles great.
As far as supporting the barrel goes, this is the first time that I've tried a non-supported .920 barrel in a 10/22. In the past I've always either bedded the barrel into the stock with epoxy, or (in one case) filled the gaps in the Hogue stock with silicone, coated the barrel with release agent, and just squished the barrel into the stock leaving it until the silicone solidified. That one resulted in what I believe used to be called a "soft bedded" barrel, and from an accuracy standpoint worked very well.
I may do something similar with the short Dlask barrel. It's obviously not as heavy as an 18-20" one but the weight flopping around on that aluminum receiver just makes me nervous.
This might be considered a thread highjack. My apologies.
John
Interesting idea with the silicone. Is it the type of stuff you get in a squeezetube from canadian tire? The Silicone II I bought for the kitchen sink and tiles has held up really well after a year of use.
This thread was completely stolen...OP is asking about SR-22...
I think a lot of people just grind down the barrel support block to fit a bull barrel. I wouldnt be surprised if someone came out with a barrel block that fits bull barrels soon
This thread was completely stolen...OP is asking about SR-22.../QUOTE]
I did, and do, apologize for the tangent onto which I pushed this thread. The OP was asking about unsupported bull barrels, and I thought my comments had some relevance, even though a different 10/22 configuration was involved.
As an aside, I don't have a SR22, but in examining one belonging to a friend, it seemed to me that a Limbsaver De-Resonator (rubber donut around the barrel, supposedly taming barrel vibrations and increasing accuray) might be made to fit into the fore-end of the SR22 and give the barrel 360 degrees of support. Whether this would help or hinder accuracy I don't know, but it would be a cheap experiment...my favourite kind! I'm going to try it next time I see him and his gun.
John
This thread was completely stolen...OP is asking about SR-22.../QUOTE]
I did, and do, apologize for the tangent onto which I pushed this thread. The OP was asking about unsupported bull barrels, and I thought my comments had some relevance, even though a different 10/22 configuration was involved.
As an aside, I don't have a SR22, but in examining one belonging to a friend, it seemed to me that a Limbsaver De-Resonator (rubber donut around the barrel, supposedly taming barrel vibrations and increasing accuray) might be made to fit into the fore-end of the SR22 and give the barrel 360 degrees of support. Whether this would help or hinder accuracy I don't know, but it would be a cheap experiment...my favourite kind! I'm going to try it next time I see him and his gun.
John
I too have thought a bout the donut idea - I think it will work as long as it's not directly touching the barrel - just enough so that if you are running with the gun that it has a travel stop from bending or putting extra pressure on the receiver area.
I called dlask today and was told they should have the .920" barrel supports available next which, which is when I will be ordering my 12.5"![]()
I have a 16.5" Dlask in an Archangel kit. I did put a Volquartsen V block in just because they won't crack if you over tighten them. I don't believe in this barrel droop talk. There is enough support in a 10 22 receiver for a bull barrel. With my Nikon 2x7-32 scope it's right on. On the other hand, why would you put a 20" barrel on. You will lose velocity. 16" has been proven to be the maximum length for .22 cal. You would be better 16" or 16.5". Even the 12" would be better. The small charge of powder in a .22rd is exhausted in a short distance, hence the bullet is only travelling on momentum which in turn slows it down.I want to mount a 20 inch barrel in my Sr 22, so this all helps.
I have a 16.5" Dlask in an Archangel kit. I did put a Volquartsen V block in just because they won't crack if you over tighten them. I don't believe in this barrel droop talk. There is enough support in a 10 22 receiver for a bull barrel. With my Nikon 2x7-32 scope it's right on. On the other hand, why would you put a 20" barrel on. You will lose velocity. 16" has been proven to be the maximum length for .22 cal. You would be better 16" or 16.5". Even the 12" would be better. The small charge of powder in a .22rd is exhausted in a short distance, hence the bullet is only travelling on momentum which in turn slows it down.