my take on it, get the smallest used 4x4 truck (older nissan, toyota, ranger) you can find... street legal and has a heater! and is likely much cheaper than a UTV. doesn't need a trailer or take up all the room in the back of a bigger truck.
According to my manual for my machine ground clearance stock is 12.6 inches, the suspension travel is 10 inches, as far as the weight distribution you are partially correct as ground pressure is constant but distance between pressure points makes a difference.
Try standing in muskeg with your feet placed right next to each other, chances are you will sink but if you spread your legs you will not sink as much, the ground pressure did not change but the way the weight is distributed did.
As i said earlier actual measured ground clearance is 15.4 inches (i rounded it up to 16) with 27'' tires filled to their proper pressure for the machine 13 psi (mud lite xtr's) with no lift installed, the factory tires on the prowler are junk and are full of sag measuring only 25'' with 10 psi in them even though they are advertised as 26'' tires, so if they were actually 26'' tires the factory ground clearance according to my manual would be 13.1''
I built a rack for mine so it fits in the back of my truck, the rhinos will also fit with a rack built, the ranger and hondas won't.
Think its time for a re-build, its blowing a little blue smoke there
Suprisingly nobody here has brought up the issue of how much fuel the UTVs will use compared to a midesize-ish quad. I could be mistaken, but wouldnt the quad use less???
I hear people say this all the time, MOST have no experience with utv's in the bush or couldn't drive a stick up a dead dogs arse.
Almost an time a tight spot is found in a trail it can be went around, also the prowler has more ground clearence than most quads, and seeing as it is wider and longer it finds traction sooner when in a mud hole than a quad, the last trip i went on every quad got stuck "every single quad got stuck" one a kawi brute force 750 blew its transmission, the prowler drug the dead quad through all the same holes the quads were getting stuck in and NEVER GOT STUCK.
So yes if you drive like a nancy they will not go where a quad will, but if you grow a set and learn how to drive they will beat a quad about 80% of the time.
I have used both Quads and Argo, If your looking for a work horse to get in and out of areas then i would take my argo over all others. Yup, there are slow, and can de rough , but with that big old cow moose being pulled out of them old stumpy cutblocks, that machine praacticxaly floats over the rough uneven ground.
I owned a 6 wheel Argo once. It would go some places an ATV wouldn't but also wouldn't go a few places an ATV would. They suck in deep mud, & hang up easily with minimum ground clearance.
Not much fun either!
I am not entirely sold on the side by side machines. they have their place on a farm, open areas, trails that are not too gnarly.
i rented one and took it on an atv rally ( i wont mention the brand name as it does not matter anyways). when the trail gets tight, very rutted up, it seems you cannot see around that front passenger side. and backing these things up in tight spaces, well bring a chainsaw with you.
If you dont have to drive the thing through very swampy areas, they can be alright. One feature i do like is being able to put a 12 ft aluminum boat on the roof (modifying the back box with an extension set-up for the boat of course) and throwing your outboard,tackle boxes, rods, gear etc in the rear box.
For true hunting applications, I feel that a midsize-ish quad(450-550cc diff lock,4wd, 2wd) and a well constructed atv wagon will give you better options.
Suprisingly nobody here has brought up the issue of how much fuel the UTVs will use compared to a midesize-ish quad. I could be mistaken, but wouldnt the quad use less???
These UTV's are starting to look more and more like Jeeps!



























